Mausoleum

Jun 21, 2012 10:57

Оригинал взят у rusideya3000 в Mausoleum
I watched the TV debate on the topic - how to bury Lenin and horonit.Tri pozitsii.Napomnyu, the position statement is based not on knowledge but on preference.
1.Ministr says Lenin should be buried, and give him a "Hero of Russia award." The new minister. Scientists around him, and there are unlikely to be (only 4% of scientific knowledge of the Russian Federation in the world of science). will be guided by Putin, Medvedev and Patriarch, and their centers, where there was no science in the USSR, and now there is no (education, then they have the best in Soviet world). For example, in China more than 50% of specialists have expertise in Europe or in SShA.Nadezhda that the new man will be able, to change something.
2.Vystupala kommunistka.Ee-Lenin's position, I did not read what was said in TSKKPSS, or Komsomol
podderzhivala.Eto gave me bread, and then remove from seychas.Potomu Lenin square is impossible.
3.Pozitsiya those who believe that Lenin should zahoronit.Tut what only reason there is (up to the ridiculous).
4.Davayte estimate correctly . I have the right to say so as the author of the theory of the state space vector and the societies of justice, in which the language of mathematics describes all known and unknown social formations, including Marx, communism, socialism of Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Marx, Communism, and the main parameters of Society Social soglasiya.Vse described in the book take a while for free avtora.Mozhno http://rusideya3000.narod.ru/Kniga1.pdf ISBN 978-5-91146-107-2. Conclusions and evaluation of the author.
1.Glavnaya theoretical error of Marx, presented in his book "Lessons of Communism."
First there was the idea of communism as an idea of a just society, and that means true no one answered so far. Marx in "The Lessons of Communism," the first item put: nationalization of the property. Lenin shared this ideyu.Oprobovav in practice, the economic policy of the surplus, then the tax in kind, which led to the Russian people an epidemic famine, Lenin came to the idea of the NEP-state kapitalizma.Rossiya for a few years out of the commodity crisis. Stalin was a consistent Marxist, he buried the NEP, together with the Communists-Leninists and
implemented in the s / s and the nationalization of industry, 100% ownership.
question arises on the basis of what Marx thought that the economy is based on the most effective state property? He conducted research and compiled experience of other countries? Or anything of the sort! Idea sucked out of your finger. If he had reviewed the experience of
industry in Russia when the Tsar's royal factories flourished and drunkenness, theft, and the gun exploded after the first shot, and in private enterprises have done excellent weapon and was in profit, it is unlikely that Marx called for the nationalization of sobstvennosti.Eto him and his followers of the main oshibka.Takoy socialism was forcibly implemented in the USSR and socialism sotsstranah.Poetomu so called socialism
of Marx, Lenin and Stalin, not to be confused with the Western interpretation of it, where
priority is given to an economy based on private property.
To be continued.
Author: Nicola at 23:38

стратегия, русская идея, общество наука политика образование

Previous post Next post
Up