Leave a comment

gotyourlocket February 26 2009, 05:44:01 UTC
Angry Scotsman wearing colours? And, er, a formal coat, for whatever reason?

I don't think it's particularly odd. Unless muggles have stopped doing this. I suppose some of our booka can be a bit out of date when it comes to muggle things. they change rather often.

Reply

clockedoutearly February 26 2009, 05:49:13 UTC
He doesn't look angry to me. An' I guess it's a formal occasion?

An' hell 'f I know, we don't have Scots in my fandom. I'm guessin' it ain't that popular anymore though.

Reply

gotyourlocket February 26 2009, 05:58:09 UTC
No? Hmm.

It's no matter, I suppose.

Reply

clockedoutearly February 26 2009, 06:08:27 UTC
Nah. Angry's more like D<. That's more like o.ó

Somethin' like that anyway.

Reply

gotyourlocket February 26 2009, 06:14:25 UTC
What?

Reply

clockedoutearly February 26 2009, 06:17:19 UTC
Not familiar with th' noble art 'f th' emoticon?

Reply

gotyourlocket February 26 2009, 06:20:38 UTC
Er. No, actually.

Reply

clockedoutearly February 26 2009, 06:22:23 UTC
'S a way of makin' facial expressions. So D< would be angry, an' (: would be smiling.

^_^ also works for happy, 'f you want it t' be 'right-side up'.

Reply

gotyourlocket February 26 2009, 06:30:05 UTC
How...pedestrian.

I suppose I'll look into it, however, as it may help me to understand some of the idiots around here a bit better.

Reply

clockedoutearly February 26 2009, 06:31:58 UTC
Might help, yeah. An' they're fun~

Reply

gotyourlocket February 26 2009, 06:33:45 UTC
I don't much care for 'fun' things.

Reply

clockedoutearly February 26 2009, 18:15:03 UTC
Sounds pretty borin', then.

Reply

gotyourlocket February 27 2009, 06:40:16 UTC
I'm often accused of that, yes.

Reply

clockedoutearly February 27 2009, 19:53:26 UTC
An' it doesn't bother you?

Reply

gotyourlocket March 5 2009, 01:02:56 UTC
No.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up