Dawkins

[citygent]

Why does Richard Dawkins think that Spirituality and Evolution are mutually exclusive?

Comments

[casadetodd]

[citygent]

And from there, we get to this Standard of 1970's British cohohomedy: Les Dawson

[apathetic_ass]

Because Richard Dawkins is a twat?

[citygent]

or a twunt

[citygent]

of course they 'can' (oh ho ho)

Isn't evolution so amazing a system, that it's beyond our comprehension?

As far as intelligent design is concerned, if you were going to design such a complex system, wouldn't you think of a way to put it on cruise control so it'd look after itself as much as possible, maintaining a constant balance, so you could concentrate on the bigger stuff?

As for me, I have no answers. I just think that the idea of dismissing all possibilities without all the facts, which Dawkins is not in possession of, is unscientific.

So I'll see your 'can of worms' and raise you with my 'self awareness'

[citygent]

I surrender

[rockontommy]

If the scientists are suggesting that I need to search for and prove conclusively that GOD exists before I have a credible argument, then I cannot...and therefore I can't WIN. Dawkins can't prove anything conclusively to me either! He is an arrogant little toad & I'd love there to be an afterlife and I'd fookin' *love* to be a fly on the wall when he meets St Peter. If, of course ;-)

[citygent]

everyone's entitled to their own point of view, but Dawkins thinks otherwise. I actually hope something nice happens to him one day and he lightens up a bit

[apathetic_ass]

Aetheism is as much of a religion as Christianity.

"We all believe in something greater than ourselves. Even if it is just the blind forces of chance"

[vickeh_33]

Les Dawson is easily the best bit of this page.

[citygent]

hidden gems

[citygent]

lolz