Tits and Activism, One Night Only Folks

Jan 28, 2007 00:15

Now I think some pretty numerous things about PETA as an organization. Say, as a protest point group; as shit disturbers; as propaganda-by-deed artists; as animal rights artsy bourgeois whores; as beneficiaries of too many decent, hard-working people's money; as representatives of the stupidest "influence campains"; as loud mouthed masochists who ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... angel_thane January 29 2007, 13:09:15 UTC
Man, that was about the dumbest video I've ever seen. No redeeming features - it looked like a failed audition tape from Naked News, who at least do it with a bit of style. That was just both pointless and unsexy. *sigh*

The problem with PETA (other than them being wrong) is that far from shining a light on the issues, they detract from them. Their campaigns never end up having people talk about fur, meat, or etc... but rather have people talking about PETA - great if you're a company trying to increase awareness of yourself; not so much if you're an organisation claiming to be trying to increase awareness of an issue.

That said, naked people is a damn sight better than mocking the holocaust.

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... citizenfemme January 29 2007, 16:45:21 UTC
Nod. But she totally is at least on the skinnier side of things, if not a bit thin.

In semi-defense of a highly questionable topical campain, they didn't mock the holocaust, they made a very potent emotional argument for animal consumption. In some eyes, where they may have a more personal attachment to that entire horror, I'm sure that comparing eating animals to the willful genocide of humans to be completely insulting and therefore a mockery. That said, I'm not justifying their horror tactics, but I must say that I *feel* what they were trying to portray regardless. I see mammal (if not all animal) life as deserving of respect, and I have no doubt that farm animals feel pain and can suffer (needlessly).

Then again, I'm sure their "holocaust on a plate" campain did wonders for notoriety. I'm sure the masochist planners got off the day that campain was launched.

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... angel_thane January 29 2007, 17:07:29 UTC
She's certainly not overweight, I'll give you that.

Mock was perhaps a bad word, but 'belittle' or 'minimised' are, IMNAAHO, entirely appropriate words for what they were doing to the holocaust.

Don't get me wrong, I also understand what they were trying to portray, and I know that it was not their intention to minimise the Holocaust - and that in their eyes, they probably didn't.

That said, it still showed a revolting contempt for human life, suffering, and atrocities. It really was much worse than getting Pamela Anderson naked.

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... citizenfemme January 29 2007, 17:17:38 UTC
I'm not sure I follow how using a horror in human history to illustrate the emotional, and life-related, magnitude of the consumption of other animals demonstrates contempt for human life and such.

I mean, I draw hilarious parallels between aborted fetuses and rejection and/or between abortions and stomach pain and/or other tragic hilarious bits all the time. That is, if I honour the sentiment of the original horror, how do I desecrate it if I use it as a simile or metaphor?

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... angel_thane January 29 2007, 17:19:02 UTC
It was presented not as 'killing chickens is like the Holocaust' but rather as 'killing chickens is equivalent to the Holocaust'. At least in my reading of the ads.

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... dukesy January 29 2007, 20:40:59 UTC
HA HA!!!

That was an AWSOME add, i loved that shit. i sent that to everyone at the time.
it was still up when i checked a couple months ago

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... angel_thane January 29 2007, 20:55:02 UTC
On the plus side, you seem to have the same birthday as me; at least on those years in which I am in North America.

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... citizenfemme February 2 2007, 03:53:57 UTC
Cracker! Why didn't you inform me of such things? I could have mailed you some cake, or at least done something abstract and electronic-based in celebration... Mr. President. ;)

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... angel_thane February 2 2007, 08:46:36 UTC
'cause it's not in my LJ UserInfo or anything... =P

Besides, remember me telling you I was going to Dublin FOR MY BIRTHDAY??? ;)

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... citizenfemme February 2 2007, 09:06:05 UTC
What part of my having no schedule and very little concept of dates for the past 7 months leaves you to believe that I can track? Really? You "going to Dublin for your Birthday" in a few days could mean anything to me, and it prolly did.

Even so, you deserve more than what kind of sounds like a lame excuse (from an outsider's perspective). That is not to say that I am quite brazen in my admitted my weird, spacy memory.

I owe you belated real wishes. The trick: you'll not know when to expect them. Dun dun duuuuun.

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... angel_thane February 2 2007, 09:08:53 UTC
Don't worry, I completely understand the notion of weird spacey memory - mine is as solid as glass as well.

Especially temporal. I can't remember when things happened, or what happened before something else. And I'm shite with dates.

Ooooh, now I'll be in a state of anticipation for the rest of the year!!! =P

Reply

Re: I'd hardly call her 'gaunt' or 'thin'... citizenfemme February 2 2007, 09:12:40 UTC
Yay, edge-of-your-seat play! haha

Reply


Leave a comment

Up