Update
I also discovered today that the authorship section as I described it yesterday is completely contrary to protocol. Which he is completely aware of. So, not only is it just a rude thing to do, it's also totally incorrect.
I'm going to wait a while to see if it gets corrected by our regional Inspector General or by the Review Team or the lawyers or any other of the scores of people who read the report. If not, I'm going to say something. I learned today that one of the grad school interns complained about being referred to as a "student assistant" in her report...she thought it was unprofessional and sounded like she was getting the analysts coffee and stuff.
I'm going to wait a while to see if it gets corrected by our regional Inspector General or by the Review Team or the lawyers or any other of the scores of people who read the report. If not, I'm going to say something. I learned today that one of the grad school interns complained about being referred to as a "student assistant" in her report...she thought it was unprofessional and sounded like she was getting the analysts coffee and stuff.