Wait... YOU MEAN THE COOK BOOK!?!?
Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby: (8.5/10)
It'll probably set NASCAR back, like 10 something years, but it's all good fun. No matter how you look at it, the movie is just a laugh, you don't even have to like NASCAR. The dialog, events and characters are just so ridiculous that it makes the movie enjoyable if you just want to laugh your head off. But if your looking for an amazing plot, you'll obviously not find it here.
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest: (8/10)
I think of it as more of a "middle man" than anything else. It's a bridge or middle ground between two movies ---- whos only purpose is to get excited for the third movie. Now really, it's not all horrible, in fact it's an enjoyable movie, it just doesn't have that same "charm" as the first one. The movie's problem is that serveral parts seem totally unnecessary (for the time being at least), certain characters are difficult to understand and that it drags itself out for far too long. Oh, and CLIFF HANGERS SUCK.
Lady in the Water: (7.5/10)
Despite Shyamalan being known for his "OMGWTF!!!1one" plot twists, this movie is mostly straight forward. It's difficult to explain how exactly I feel about this movie... Uh... it drags on a lot, giving a large amount of back ground information to side-characters and can get confusing with all the terms.
Other (older) movies seen:
RV: (7/10)
Just Friends: (6.5/10)
Rocky Horror Picture Show: (9/10)
Creep Show 2: (5/10)
Labyrinth: (6/10)
Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy: (7.5/10)
Shaun of the Dead: (9/10)
Monty Python and the Holy Grail: (9/10)
It'll probably set NASCAR back, like 10 something years, but it's all good fun. No matter how you look at it, the movie is just a laugh, you don't even have to like NASCAR. The dialog, events and characters are just so ridiculous that it makes the movie enjoyable if you just want to laugh your head off. But if your looking for an amazing plot, you'll obviously not find it here.
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest: (8/10)
I think of it as more of a "middle man" than anything else. It's a bridge or middle ground between two movies ---- whos only purpose is to get excited for the third movie. Now really, it's not all horrible, in fact it's an enjoyable movie, it just doesn't have that same "charm" as the first one. The movie's problem is that serveral parts seem totally unnecessary (for the time being at least), certain characters are difficult to understand and that it drags itself out for far too long. Oh, and CLIFF HANGERS SUCK.
Lady in the Water: (7.5/10)
Despite Shyamalan being known for his "OMGWTF!!!1one" plot twists, this movie is mostly straight forward. It's difficult to explain how exactly I feel about this movie... Uh... it drags on a lot, giving a large amount of back ground information to side-characters and can get confusing with all the terms.
Other (older) movies seen:
RV: (7/10)
Just Friends: (6.5/10)
Rocky Horror Picture Show: (9/10)
Creep Show 2: (5/10)
Labyrinth: (6/10)
Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy: (7.5/10)
Shaun of the Dead: (9/10)
Monty Python and the Holy Grail: (9/10)