i found
this to be an interesting article (and discussion). that said, and while it brings up a few noteworthy points, it does seem to be both a touch gimmicky (not to mention that the use different "selves" as opposed to facets of one self seems to provide an easy way to for someone to shirk responsibility for one's actions [or to blame said shirking on a lack of cunning/cleverness]), and not without an agenda (a noted use of sobriety/inebriation as example throughout, only to practically endorse adderall towards the end? governments and businesses should help people inhibit "gut feelings and emotional reactions"? i guess it's appropriate, since the guy, as a psychologist [or professor thereof, i suppose] is inclined towards rationality and reductionism, but i can't help but be reminded [in humour] of a lighthearted and p[h]unny
book i read recently).
in other news, recent awesomeness includes: hemingway (the
bell has almost tolled [but for whom?], and soon the
sun will also rise), (night 5 of) the
x avant festival (never disappoints),
villain accelerate (partly because
sixtoo himself is a certain kind of awesome),
dead space (because as great as
bioshock was [which would be "a lot"], an heir to the
system shock series' throne it was not),
july skies (the relatable sounds of
days gone by [but not yet]),
hugo riemann (whose works, though i'm not yet familiar with them, seem intriguing, and his approach to the
harmonic function of scale degrees even moreso), and on a final tangent, i'd like to find
this book somewhere/time.