(Untitled)

Apr 25, 2005 00:05

Right now it's looking like only two of my friends will be going to my wedding. I'm trying not to be heartbroken about it, but it's difficult. I understand that it's really hard for people to travel all the way across the Atlantic for a wedding, which is why we are having it in England in the first place. Mike gets to see his British friends and ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

chite April 25 2005, 12:16:40 UTC
I'm so sorry to hear this.

I think that when it comes to weddings, there are 2 types of people--those who will travel and those who won't, and it doesn't matter how far the travelling is. I had people complain that my wedding was in DC when they would have to travel from New York, 4 driving hours away. Yet I've gone to weddinigs where I took a multi-hour flight followed by a 2 hour drive to the middle of nowhere, and I know people who happily and eagerly travelled to Europe for a wedding. It was really hurtful to me when people wouldn't travel to get to DC, when I would have gone just about anywhere for them.

Anyway, I feel for you.

Reply

virginiadare April 25 2005, 12:23:07 UTC
I think she is right. It's too bad, I know your wedding will be unforgettable.

If it is any consolation, it will allow you to stretch your celebration, because your loved ones do want to celebrate with you and I honestly think small weddings are more fun for bride and groom. You don't want the day to fly by with so many people.

I know that I'm overly looking on the bright side because there were special people you wanted to see on that very day.

Mike's family is going to be your family!

Reply

christilyn April 25 2005, 13:58:15 UTC
I am thinking we need to have a party at my house for Charlotte and Mike and any of their DC area friends who want to come. A post wedding party. :)

Reply

ladyfiona April 25 2005, 16:16:18 UTC
I would totally help you set that up!

Reply

virginiadare April 25 2005, 16:30:49 UTC
i am so totally interested in that!

Reply

lkell April 25 2005, 17:03:42 UTC
We could really do something smashing for them here ... and I agree that we should!

Reply

charlottesweb April 26 2005, 15:35:56 UTC
Oh that's so nice! I'd love that, thank you.

Reply

lkell April 26 2005, 17:50:02 UTC
we need to figure out when they will be back in DC area post-wedding to view pictures/celebrate/act silly together! PLease consider me a part of your party-planning committee!

Reply

charlottesweb April 26 2005, 15:48:28 UTC
That's true that small weddings are really nice, and they give the bride and the groom more opportunities to talk with their guests. I know I'll enjoy it, and I'm really glad that I'll be able to spend time with the people who flew all the way out there to be with us. Still I always wanted the big dance party, but of course I realize that isn't what's important.

Reply

virginiadare April 26 2005, 17:50:33 UTC
I think it's important for the bride to be utterly spoiled and I'm sorry that some adult compromises are coming into place.

I do want to see pictures! It's going to be quite a happy happy day!

Reply

charlottesweb April 26 2005, 15:35:34 UTC
Wow, that's so sad that some of your guests weren't willing to travel from New York to your wedding. I'd be hurt, too. Perhaps you're right that some people just won't travel for a wedding. I guess you and I must fall into the category of willing travelers. I've traveled to Atlanta, Phoenix, Montana, Minnesota, New Jersey, and even offered to fly to Croatia. I've been to several weddings where I knew no one in the room but the bride, and I didn't even have a date to talk to. It's not always easy, but I just think that weddings are worth it.

Reply

lkell April 26 2005, 17:48:25 UTC
here here! I lived in Boston when I had 4 weddings in DC and 3 in Boston area that year ... went to every one (and was in 2 of them!). To me, it's an honor and any invite I get, I make the wedding unless there is some sort of huge conflict that can't be rearranged.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up