(Untitled)
I havent had a real good long solid entry in awhile so i decided today will be the one ....EH Fuck it
One thing thought fuck all the stupid LIBERALS...they have no idea what they are talking about
Mr Tucker....
Emmalee.......MICHEAL MOORE IS A MORON
FUCK JOHN KERRY AND JOHN EDWARDS
W 'O4
kerry is a moron
http://www.kerryoniraq.com/
Moore is a moron
Moore Sense Please
By: Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, Jul 29, 2004
(Boston) Well, I finally tracked down Michael Moore. I saw him walking in the street outside the Democratic Convention Center and pounced on him like the paparazzi on J-Lo. Moore had been dodging me because his movie was becoming increasingly indefensible by something called "facts." But, to his credit, Moore took up my street challenge and agreed to appear on "The Factor".
We debated for ten minutes and Moore put forth the following:
That President Bush "lied" about Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction even though the 9/11 Commission, the Senate Intelligence Committee Investigation and Lord Butler's British Investigation all say Bush did not lie.
Moore defines a "lie" as anything that turns out not to be true. By following this logic, weather forecasters everywhere must now be categorized as pathologically dishonest.
Moore said he would not have attacked the Taliban government in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attack. Instead, he would have captured Bin laden by using "commandos." Apparently, Moore believes the Taliban would have allowed his "commandos" to root out Osama and his boys with impunity. Moore related the "commando" strategy to me with a straight face.
Moore denied that Ronald Reagan's arms build up had anything to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union and freedom for Eastern Europe.
The filmmaker then went on to say that pre-emptive war is wrong and would have been immoral even in the case of Adolf Hitler. Moore said he would have prevented Hitler from assuming power in the first place. I didn't have time ask him how he would have done that but I assume commandos would have been involved.
So, hey, Michael Moore this bud's for you. Thanks for showing up and debating. Now we know the under-pinnings of your world outlook.
What is still astounding to me is how many people continue to embrace the fantasies and deceptions of Michael Moore. Some people actually applauded him at the Democratic Convention, but the heavyweights stayed away.
In one bizarre scene, Moore was seated next to Rosalyn and Jimmy Carter. The couple stared straight ahead, looking like contestants about to eat bugs on the "Fear Factor," and the Kerry campaign has made it quite clear that Moore and other left-wing bomb throwers are not to be seen around the candidate.
In fact, the Kerry people actually censored some of the speechmakers from using inflammatory anti-Bush rhetoric. That is almost unheard of at a political convention.
But old reliable Howard Dean came through. He continues to be Michael Moore's best pal, appearing with him at a Bush bash in a Cambridge hotel. It is absolutely frightening how close Governor Dean came to being the Democratic presidential nominee.
This may surprise you, but I do not dislike Michael Moore. He is a true believer. He wants a completely different kind of country, and he'll do anything to make that happen.
The problem with Moore is that the ends justify the means. He knows his statements and movies are not based on facts, but he continues to say they are. Even in Moore's world where truth doesn't exist, there should be some kind of ethical standard, but there isn't. And the fact that Howard Dean and other powerful Americans accept that situation is more troubling than anything Michael Moore could ever say.
Reply
America now has approximately the same number of citizens out of work as the number of illegal aliens working inside the United States.
Coincidence?
Probably not.
Liberals (and Buchanan populists) complain that we export jobs overseas to low-wage workers in foreign countries. Yet liberals simultaneously want to import those very same workers here to the United States, where they will take jobs from Americans, receive free medical care from an overburdened health-care system, get a free education in their native language, hopefully become citizens and vote for Democrats.
Democrats are pinning their hopes for this November's election on convincing voters that we have a weak economy and a jobless recovery, if only in the hardest-hit, battleground states such as Ohio. But what causes a jobless recovery, anyway?
America now has approximately the same number of citizens out of work as the number of illegal aliens working inside the United States.
Coincidence?
Probably not.
We are told (over and over, without proof, like mass hypnosis) that these are jobs that Americans won't do. Actually, Americans with advanced degrees and high-tech skills usually can find work. But our economy used to provide ample opportunities for high school graduates to make a decent living and support a family without going to college. The greatest challenge in our economy now is for low-skilled U.S. citizens who hope to work straight out of high school or vocational training. The jobs that "Americans won't do" are exactly the same jobs that are in the shortest supply for U.S. citizens today.
It's curious. In a recent Senate hearing, the president of a Texas roofing company testified that he must hire illegal aliens for roofing work. Yet I know a radio talk-show host, an ex-Marine and former congressional candidate, who personally does roofing work on the side to help pay for his radio show. Maybe employers just aren't looking in the right places.
The groups hardest hit are less-educated American citizens and legal immigrants, who are disproportionately black or Hispanic, poor or young people just getting started in life.
Although we are sold the image of farm laborers out in the field, proposals are by no means limited to that very small circle of occupations. An agricultural labor problem is being used to oversell a massive change affecting nearly every area of our economy. And there is already a special visa for farmers lawfully to hire farm laborers. The only change needed is a reform of the disastrous Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) bureaucracy to process agricultural visas more quickly. Reform of the bureaucracy (not the law) is desperately needed.
Of course, employers can adjust the dial on salaries and manipulate whether jobs are unacceptable to Americans. Whoever sets the wages can decide whether Americans "won't do" a job. I am an attorney who has filed paperwork for companies to legally hire foreign workers (and I am personally sponsoring an immigrant this summer). However, the current system obligates employers to offer the same salary and working hours to foreign workers as to Americans. That avoids undercutting American workers. But new proposals for guest-worker programs would relax this safeguard.
So it is a self-fulfilling prophecy:
Advertise a salary so low that it becomes exploitation and - by definition - no American will want that job.
Ironically, liberals fight for increases in the minimum wage, yet encourage trespassers to enter the United States. They then drive down all wages throughout the economy.
Minorities are beginning to realize that illegal immigration is taking away their entry-level jobs and cutting their incomes by overall downward pressure.
Reply
Leave a comment