signal boost: Purina food could be hurting your pets

[cellio]

Thanks to siderea for pointing me to this post about problems with Purina pet food (dog and cat, at least). After seeing this I read the last several month's worth of consumer-affiars complaints, and older ones about the specific foods relevant to me. (Warning: can be gross.) This goes well beyond "ew, yuck" to "get that stuff out of the house before

Comments

[hildakrista]

I'm sorry you thought my reply was defensive. I thought it was pretty straightforward, giving a different point of view. If my post about vets seems a bit miffed, it's true I do get miffed at poor quality care for animals, and who would blame me? I care a lot about peoples' pets.

Nowhere in my reply did I say that real problems shouldn't be reported to the company. Of course they should! Infestation is a problem that normally doesn't originate with the manufacturer, but one that should be reported nonetheless. You are right... QA will never catch infestation because it usually originates after the product is out of the company's hands - that is, in stores and homes. That's why it IS important to contact them!

I can say to the fact there were a lot of complaints about Purina: they sell a muck lot of food. The more you sell, the more complaints you get. Volume of sales has everything to do with volume of complaints.

I applaud you for trying to find some kind of response from Purina - you are good at research. However, I would point out that the website in the post is just a sounding board for upset people. The website doesn't send these complaints to the company... it doesn't compile them, look for patterns, do any reporting to companies. What was Purina supposed to be responding to? They responded to the people that contacted them directly, and some of the posts even said they did. If people post complaints to that website and don't send any info to Purina, Purina simply doesn't kow about. Consumeraffairs.com and the hundreds of websites like them (though most not as nice-looking), provide a place for people to sound off anecdotally without any further assistance toward resolution. You and I both know the problems with anecdotal evidence.

[cellio]

I'm sorry that I read something that you didn't intend. You have a good point about that web site. I assume that these days every major company has people who track what's being said about them out there (Google alerts and the like) and monitors the known complaint sites, but those people are probably in marketing and don't necessarily do anything useful with the information.

[woodwindy]

I respect that you're being even-handed and analytical about this. Having said that...

One of my beloved cats passed away unexpectedly not long ago, with two different major veterinary centers unable to pinpoint any primary cause of his dramatic decline. Guess what he was eating?

I don't honestly give a damn how Purina does or doesn't respond to the concerns, and I couldn't care less how anecdotal the evidence is. There will not be any more Purina food in our house unless the company demonstrates a major overhaul of its processes. There's just absolutely no reason to risk it when other brands are at the same price point and haven't had any reported issues.

[hildakrista]

I'm very sorry about your kitty... it's hard to lose a fuzzy family member! I also respect your decision not to use Purina, if you feel that's best for your family.

But I'm wondering why you think that other brands don't get similar complaints?

[woodwindy]

Sorry, I can see that my last sentence wasn't as clear as it could have been. I know that most brands have at least some complaints out there (although there are some that don't!). Consumeraffairs.com has a decent -- not perfect, but decent -- representation of active government investigations and consumer complaints re. a variety of companies, and it's pretty straightforward to see where there are significant, consistent concerns over a period of time vs. the "I switched my cat to this food with no transition period and now he has runny bowels, this food must be from teh debbil!" or "This food gave my dog melanoma" kind of things.

[cellio]

I think everybody in this discussion understands that correlation does not equal causation. That said, though, correlation is still...correlation. So given two otherwise-equal options, and recognizing that "don't know something bad about the other yet" is not the same as "nothing bad", I think the prudent path is to go with the other one. If the same problems turn up everywhere then the choices are to take your chances on one of them anyway (nothing in life is completely safe) or roll your own (which few of us have time/inclination to do).

Right now, for me and I presume woodwindy, Purina is at the bottom of the list. They may be no worse than anybody else, but we can only act on the incomplete data we have.