It is interesting that bondsmen are heritable, just as slaves are. That might make for some uncomfortable situations, depending on what caused one to be bound.
It makes sense that they would be heritable; they represent both a debt and a service, so if the widow can use the other assets, she should get those ones too. If this creates a bad situation (I'm not sure how common that would be), I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there's what amounts to a trade market. (I would expect all parties to have to agree, of course.)
Widowhood, not that I know anything of lawanniemalDecember 14 2007, 19:48:36 UTC
If a woman binds herself to her mate, she inherits his life, which was hers, prior to his death. His responsibilities are hers. A good wife knows them. Her children or his other heirs owe her support. It is what is proper and true to the Golden Rule. They will inherit in time. Greed is always ugly
( ... )
Comments 5
(But you might not be a Jane Austen fan.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment