daf bit: Ketuvot 103

Dec 13, 2007 09:07

The mishna teaches: should a widow say "I have no desire to move from ( Read more... )

daf bits

Leave a comment

Comments 5

ginamariewade December 13 2007, 17:27:39 UTC
This would have made Sense and Sensibility turn out entirely different, don't you think?

(But you might not be a Jane Austen fan.)

Reply

cellio December 14 2007, 03:11:46 UTC
Not specifically a fan, but I vaguely recall a movie vresion of that one, yeah.

Reply


byronhaverford December 13 2007, 20:15:57 UTC
It is interesting that bondsmen are heritable, just as slaves are. That might make for some uncomfortable situations, depending on what caused one to be bound.

Reply

cellio December 14 2007, 03:17:27 UTC
It makes sense that they would be heritable; they represent both a debt and a service, so if the widow can use the other assets, she should get those ones too. If this creates a bad situation (I'm not sure how common that would be), I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there's what amounts to a trade market. (I would expect all parties to have to agree, of course.)

Reply


Widowhood, not that I know anything of law anniemal December 14 2007, 19:48:36 UTC
If a woman binds herself to her mate, she inherits his life, which was hers, prior to his death. His responsibilities are hers. A good wife knows them. Her children or his other heirs owe her support. It is what is proper and true to the Golden Rule. They will inherit in time. Greed is always ugly ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up