I received an obnoxious phone call from an
obnoxious
institution today. I will now attempt to give them the public
humiliation they deserve -- well, at least as public as a journal with
under 200 readers can be. :-)
Their machine called my cell phone saying approximately thus: "Please do
not hang up. This is not a solicitation. We have a Very Important
Message for you. Call 800-967-2070 for your Very Important Message."
(The message is not important enough to be available at all hours; they
went on to give times to call.)
I didn't recognize the number and Sprint used to do this sort of crap
for things related to my phone service, so I assumed Verizon might be
similar. I called.
Someone: Hello?
Me: I'm returning a call from you. Who are you?
Someone: [mumble] collection services.
Me: I think you have a wrong number.
Someone: I think you have an unpaid hospital bill.
Me: Whom are you trying to reach?
Someone: I'm not allowed to say.
Me: (silence)
Someone: I'll transfer you to [mumble].
Mumble: Who is this?
Me: I returned a call from you and was transferred here. I think you
have a wrong number.
Mumble: [type type] Is this John?
Me: There is no John at this number.
Mumble: Are you sure? We're looking for John Sykes.
Me: I've had this number for several years. Please update your records.
Mumble: Ok. [click]
(Aside: I never gave my number, so they obviously had caller ID -- which
would have reported my name as well.)
I understand that this sort of thing is typical for collection agencies:
leave a cryptic message to try to dupe the target into calling, and
then... what? If it's gotten to collections, the person probably
already knows that someone thinks there's a debt. And anyone who's had
past experience with collections will probably recognize the ploy and
not return the call -- meaning that the only people who return such
calls are those who haven't learned about this yet. I really wonder how
this is profitable for them.
It seems likely that the subset of debtors who do so willfully, who
never had any intention of paying the bill, would give out false contact
information. Given that, these businesses ought to try to behave better when
dealing with the innocent bystanders. Being a little more up front when
I called, not immediately accusing me, and -- gasp -- maybe apologizing
for the error would not have been out of line.
But, of course, I am neither their target nor their customer, so they
don't have to care. Except that in the extremely unlikely event that I
ever need to hire a collection agency, I will now know to do my best to
investigate their tactics first and not reward bad behavior with my
business. And maybe some of my readers, who might be more likely to
need the services of such places, will keep that in mind.
(In case you're wondering, I identified them by googling the phone
number -- a technique I will remember for future mysterious calls. I'm
not convinced that I ever have a reason to return a call from a
collection agency; if they really think it's me, eventually they'll send
a paper letter and I'll correct them then.)