religion and profession
osewalrus posted an excellent essay on conflicts between religion and one's profession. He and I agree: you are completely free to practice your religion, but if doing so causes complications in your life, you -- not the rest of society -- need to deal with that.
This becomes a wider question of "Should there be Catholic Hospitals?" since the prevailing wind happens to blow against Catholic morality.
Recently, in a community I read, a woman posted (in a locked post) about having been raped and that she was given Plan B and told to take it as it was a part of her rape kit (for prosecuting her rapist). She is Catholic and only realized later, when she came out of the traumatic daze of having being raped, what had happened. She didn't have the choice to even choose her morality.
There's a growing vocal section of American society that thinks that circumcision of male children is child abuse, mutilation, and barbaric. Should there come a point in the future where the majority of Americans feel that it is immoral to circumcise, is the answer for all Jews and Muslims and anyone else who would like to circumcise their son to move out of the US?
When can you take a stand to preserve your job, your service to others, or your ability to live in a society due to your morality?
It is hard, yes. I realize this. But when do you sit down and shut up and when do you stand up and shout out? And *who* gets to decide this?
Reply
I think everyone wins if a person in this situation can focus on serving people who share his morality. I have no more problem with the idea of Catholic (or Jewish or Muslim or Wiccan or...) medical practices than I do with such schools. People aren't all the same, and there's nothing wrong and quite a bit good with forming voluntary associations to meet the needs of a specific community. (This does not mean becoming insular, as it's not likely to affect all areas of life.)
The problem with "X hospitals" or "Y schools" or "Z pharmacies" arises when they're the only option. So long as there's a "public" or "secular" option, people can self-select into the specialization wihtout harming anyone else. There are parts of the country where I suspect that religious institutions would be in danger of being the only options (that is, there'd be no public hospital, just the Catholic one -- ok, Evangelical in the places I'm thinking of), but this is just a different form of the underserved-communities problem. (It's the same as when no one's willing to open a grocery store in the bad part of town.) I don't have a good solution to that; I merely point out that it's a broader problem.
She is Catholic and only realized later, when she came out of the traumatic daze of having being raped, what had happened. She didn't have the choice to even choose her morality.
That's really sad.
Should there come a point in the future where the majority of Americans feel that it is immoral to circumcise, is the answer for all Jews and Muslims and anyone else who would like to circumcise their son to move out of the US?
You know me; I don't think this is government's business. Given that, private practice will continue even if more and more hospitals say they won't offer the service any more. (And anyway, people who care about religious circumcission won't use the hospitals for it anyway.) So that wouldn't be a problem. If that pressure leads to a ban on circumcission, that's the same kind of problem as any other attack on civil liberties and personal freedom.
Reply
Leave a comment