(1) Over the last few years, Pittsburgh has turned up with increasing
regularity on assorted "Most Livable Cities" lists. What do you like
most? Least?
Things I like:
- It feels more like a small town than a large city. This is probably
due in part to the fact that it's really a collection of neighborhoods
(with fuzzy boundaries).
- People are reasonably friendly. Yeah, there are gang-infested
parts of town that you just stay out of, but overall, the odds are that
the person you say "hi" to will say "hi" back, and it's reasonably safe
to walk down the street at 11pm.
- Parks and other nice places to walk.
- The paths may be weird and feel non-euclidean, but you can get most
places within 15 minutes by car.
- The cost of living is pretty hard to beat.
- Universities and high-tech jobs.
- Houses are mostly old and full of character; also, houses rather
than apartments/condos are the dominant form of housing.
- About 15 synagogues within walking distance of my house.
- Cloud cover. No, really. Pittsburgh is high on the list of "cities
with the fewest sunny days" (Seattle tops the list), and I'm just
fine with that. I function better when the bright sun isn't
half-blinding me.
- Decent entertainment options, from theatre to the symphony to
museums (including the quirky ones) to clubs.
Things I don't like:
- One-party rule, made even worse by a mayor who ruined
the place financially.
- Public transit isn't so hot at night, on weekends, or
when traversing paths that don't pass through downtown.
- Most drivers do not grok bicyclists. This is made worse by many
bicyclists not grokking the rules of the road.
Ok, many drivers don't grok other drivers either, but it takes the
form of stupidity more than aggression.
- Chains and mega-stores are driving out small businesses. That might
not be specific to Pittsburgh, though.
- The climate seems different from what I remember as a child; instead
of having real spring and fall, we sometimes seem to dither winter and
summer. It's kind of weird.
- I sometimes have trouble figuring out what to do for tourists.
There's lots of cool stuff when you live here, but what do you
do with relatives who are in for a few days?
(2) Some time ago, you moved your SCA persona from migration-era
Scandinavia to al-Andalus. Does She'era enjoy any advantages that Ellisif
would not? Or vice versa?
She'erah has a much better shot at literacy. She probably also has
wider cultural opportunities; it's not that she'd really be hanging
out with the Muslims in Cordova directly, but their mere presence gives
her access to art, architecture, and music that are not from her own
culture.
Ellisif might have stronger family ties -- that is, clan and not just
household. I don't know enough about how the Jewish quarter in
Cordova really functioned.
She'erah has better climate. Ellisif has easier-to-research clothes. :-)
(3) How would you feel about living in a community in which your faith
has a greater demographic presence (e.g. Borough Park (ultra-Orthodox);
Kew Gardens (Orthodox); Upper West Side (Reform-ish))?
That's an interesting question (and part of why these answers have been
so long in coming).
I think I would be happy with a slightly stronger demographic
presence, but the risk of going too far is that differences are
accentuated and that can be awkward. My practice is almost certainly
not going to be exactly like that of my hypothetical religious neighbors;
if they're gentiles or Jews from a different movement then no one really
blinks, but if we're "supposed" to be more similar than we actually are,
that would seem to invite judgement (particularly of the negative
variety). I've heard this complaint from people living in frum
communities. It's not that it's "group think" per se; it's that
people feel that having that connection gives them the right to judge.
I don't know what a Reform community would look like. Reform, pretty
much by definition, isn't united by practice, but practice is what's
readily visible. Few people initiate theological discussions with
neighbors while out walking the dog, y'know? So we might have theology
in common, but that's not obvious. (Sadly, many people who call themselves
Reform do it as a default rather than because they've thought about it.
This helps to nurture the impression that Reform = non-observant, when
for the serious Jews those can be somewhat orthogonal
considerations.) I don't know Upper West Side, so I'm afraid I
can't judge based on that.
(4) For argument's sake, you are the director of your Barony's
instrumental/dance music consort :-) Three enthusiastic newbies approach
you about joining the group: A plays clarinet, B plays trombone, and C
plays mountain dulcimer. What would you say to each of them?
You said this is my barony's group, so I'm taking that to mean a group
that's open to pretty much all comers, on the "you should make an effort"
line. No formal auditions, and no restricted membership. That's the
way all the baronial groups operate here (choir, consort, drama troupe).
There are also "private" groups kicking around, but there's an effort
to have something available for random people. All that said,
the groups work at a certain level and aren't necessarily going to slow
down too much to accommodate players who aren't at that level,
though we'll try to give newcomers some offline help.
We'll encourage 'em, teach 'em, send 'em home with music to practice,
but we won't dumb down the repertoire for 'em. And, all that
said, while we prefer authentic performances to non, we recognize that
this is really a continuum. Our consort has often been home to silver
flutes, plastic baroque recorders, and guitars.
(I've done my best to describe prevailing attitudes in my own barony.)
Now, set against that, I'm a serious musician and a Laurel. :-)
To all of them I would first say "welcome" and talk to them about the
sorts of music we do. I'd do my best to make them feel at home. I'd
get them playing with us for at least one practice before talking
more specifically about instruments; I want them to see that we're a
fun group early (if they're inclined to believe that at all, I mean).
For those who are used to reading music in some wacky transposition
(read: anything other than modern treble and bass clefs), I would
apologetically explain that we don't have special music for them
but I encourage them to try reading the standard notation, which
isn't as hard as it might seem and here, let me show you. Then...
To the clarinet player: Have you played other reed instruments, like
cornettos or shawms? [Mention Pennsic loud band.] Would you be
interested in helping to teach others in this group to play reeds?
It would be an interesting variation to try from our usual soft
instruments. (This is assuming that the few locals who own reed
instruments are willing to help out. We've got two people who bring
them around regularly.)
As I said, we play mostly soft instruments in this group, so we might
have some balance issues with any reeds. Would you be interested in
playing recorder some of the time? Here's one that has spacings
similar to what you're used to; let me show you how the scale is laid out.
To the trombone player: Wow, neat -- we don't get many brass
players. Do you have a mute? (Aside: we did actually once have a
trombonist who succeeded in blending in with a recorders-and-strings
consort given the right mute.) To this one, too, I might suggest
trying another instrument some of the time, just for variety and
flexibility. On the other hand, in some settings a trombone may be
just what we want, particularly if we can get the reeds too. :-)
I'd also point him at the two local people who play horn fanfares for
courts.
To the mountain-dulcimer player: Mountain dulcimer was the first
instrument I played in the SCA too. Fun, isn't it? Do you finger-pick?
A lot of our music might not work so well with a strummed style because
the harmonies are a little different than you're used to. You might also
find yourself having to work around some accidentals, particularly
if you don't have the 6.5 fret. That's part of why I play hammer
dulcimer now. No, it's not nearly as hard as it looks; I can show you
if you'd like.
Do you play other fretted instruments too? If you play clasical guitar
then you can probably play lute lines, which are pretty nifty.
[The rationale here is that lots of mountain-dulcimer players leave
their guitars at home in favor of the "older, more authentic" instrument,
except that that isn't necessarily true. Yeah, I know about the
scheitholt, but it's not clear to me how much it was played in groups.]
(5) What do you most enjoy cooking? What would you most enjoy having
someone else cook for you?
To answer the second part first, I really appreciate a good grilled
steak. A friend of mine is very good with this, so I get to indulge
this from time to time. Somehow, I just never got the steak clues.
(Aside: I find bison steaks to be more compatable with my only-semi-skill.
One of these days I'm going to see what my friend can do with a gift of
bison -- if I can make them taste good, then he can
probably make them taste absolutely fabulous.)
As for what I enjoy cooking, there's not really one thing, but I
really like cooking fish (and eating it, which is probably related :-) ).
While assembly isn't "cooking", I also enjoy making vegetable salads.
And I quite enjoy working on a good curry, though Dani's not as much of
a fan so I don't do this often. Someday I'd like to learn Indian
cooking. (I do a passable mattar paneer, but that's it.)