Apr 19, 2005 18:36
Coronation is coming up soon. In this kingdom, it's customary for
the peerage orders to be called into court (each order separately), and
for a spokesman of the order to acknowledge the new king and queen and
promise to uphold the laws of the kingdom and keep doing the things that
peers do. Sometimes this goes well and sometimes the spokesman says
things on behalf of the order that not all order members agreed to.
I've begun agitating for a fixed text from within the order.
So anyway, today the incoming king and queen sent email to the peers
about ceremonial stuff, including an innocent mention of the orders
swearing their oaths of service. This has caused some...
discussion... on the pelican list. (The pelican is the peerage for
service; among things, we have a high concentration of rules wonks.)
The laurel list (arts), so far, has been silent. I cannot speak to
the chivalry, as I'm not a member.
After some of us said "um, not quite", one of our newer members asked "why
such animosity that you don't want to swear an oath of service?". Well,
there are a couple issues, but at least for me, they have nothing to
do with animosity. I have nothing against the incoming royalty.
These are purely matters of principle -- but important, strongly-held
principle.
First and foremost: the word "oath" (or "swear", which to me implies
"oath"). I do not swear oaths to people.
An oath is a grave matter involving God; this is not a matter for
participation in a hobby, no matter how much I enjoy that hobby.
I don't even "swear" when being seated on a jury; I'm sure not going
to do it in the SCA. I don't care whether my persona would have (though
I think she wouldn't); my persona must always be limited by what I,
real-world me, am permitted. The SCA is not play-acting in the way that
a theatre production is; while we take on personae, we are also still
us. We are not merely portraying characters.
So I won't "swear", but I will "promise" or "affirm". If my word is not
good enough unless accompanied by the word "oath", then there is a deeper
problem. But I don't think that's the case -- within the SCA, I think
my word as a peer and as an honorable person is good enough,
so why require extra stringency?
(There is a secondary matter of just what we are promising to do. Some
people make vague oaths "to serve the kingdom", without defining the
parameters. That's bad, and a lie -- we all have concerns that
would trump the SCA. I will not say that lie, and I don't like being
asked to ascent when someone else says that lie. Yes, we all know
what is really meant, but words are important. As peers and
presumably role models, we should strive to say what we mean and mean
what we say.)
It's gotten to the point where I hesitate to go up when the order is called,
because I'm not sure what the spokesman is going to say and I might not
want to be seen to be bound by it. And sometimes the spokesman has the
clue but the king and queen don't, so they'll say something like "we'll
hear your oath now" and the spokesman doesn't correct them becuase that's
seen as rude. Oh well; more often than not I don't even make it to
Coronation anyway. (This time, for example, it is being held on Erev
Pesach.) If I were going, I would just try to get that spokesman role
for myself. But maybe, by having this discussion, we've raised just a little
bit of awareness, and maybe it will still be there the next time this
comes up.
judaism: theology,
sca: philosophy