It's that time of year again: daffodils are coming up, the sun is re-establishing itself as a welcome and warming presence instead of some dimly remembered thing of olden time, and people who don't know any better are circulating that bloody story about Eostre's Hare. Again.
I've blogged extensively about Eostre in the past and don't intend to
(
Read more... )
Comments 34
Reply
Reply
But yes, it does seem weird; the evil Catholic Church, despite being a nation of book-keepers who wrote reams about reams about everything they ever did, decided to persecute the pagans very very quietly, and somehow managed to destroy all evidence that paganism had ever existed _and_ that they'd ever persecuted them, with total success except for the remaining secret pagans who carried on business as normal in total secret, and who then all re-emerged in the 19th century, suddenly willing to divulge all their secrets to anyone who asked.
Sounds likely to me!
Reply
http://books.google.at/books/about/D_Georgii_Franck_de_Franckenau_Satyrae_m.html?id=ZUXvizTXw-UC
The discussion is in Satyra XIX (19), starting on page 396 (413 of the PDF file). Notice that Franckenau is just quoting other custom reports, for example from among the Rus, which he takes from Olearis' Persian Travel Descriptions, etc. So there are earlier time points to be mined here, just Franckenau's quoting style makes that difficult to do so quickly.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
What is funny is that people think that this has some impact on their current worship. As if adding data to a deity's portfolio is not as old a practice as religion. Gods change over time. Always have. So to modern pagans, I usually say, "No, there's no historical reference for this at all ... but do it if you want. if there's really an Eostre, I doubt she minds. If it works for you, go with it. Just stop pretending that you've continued on a millenia old tradition. Admit that it's a new thing and be okay with that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment