Another comics complaint...
"And now here we are in a world in which Brokeback Mountain is considered revolutionary and will win all sorts of honors without a word that we did it first. Sure, ours was more of a comedy, but it still dealt with the issues and was a fun read!"
"It’s just sad to me that once again Hollywood will have trumped us at our own game and managed to break ground where we couldn’t even though we dug out the first few shovel-fuls."
Old news from everyone's favorite Marvel EIC, right?
I don't really understand this, and it's been bothering me for a while. "Brokeback Mountain" - the story by Anne Proulx - was first published, I believe, in 1997. That means it came out more than half a decade before the Rawhide MAX series everyone's talking about, right? (The Rawhide series came out in 2003.)
But hey, Hollywood ignores the AWESOME GENIUS of comic books, and comic books ignore that silly lit mag junk, it's all good. Right?
"It’s just sad to me that once again Hollywood will have trumped us at our own game and managed to break ground where we couldn’t even though we dug out the first few shovel-fuls."
Old news from everyone's favorite Marvel EIC, right?
I don't really understand this, and it's been bothering me for a while. "Brokeback Mountain" - the story by Anne Proulx - was first published, I believe, in 1997. That means it came out more than half a decade before the Rawhide MAX series everyone's talking about, right? (The Rawhide series came out in 2003.)
But hey, Hollywood ignores the AWESOME GENIUS of comic books, and comic books ignore that silly lit mag junk, it's all good. Right?