discussion/suggestions;; activity standards part III -- revenge of the bullet points

[killyoudead]

Hey all! Again! This is going to be the last of the discussion posts regarding the activity adjustments -- sorry this one is so late! These clocks are so slippery and hard to account for. Anyway. This post is mostly going to deal with issues regarding activity warning status and miscellaneous other topics, but also thing like comment numbers. This

Comments

[noelleno]

Six for logs seems really reasonable for me. I'd be okay with that. Six to ten, really. Anywhere in there I'd be okay with. Beyond that, it's hard. Because I'm not always very fast and those who tag me can vouch on it taking me a day or three to get through my more thoughtful threads.

I would still allow the two-month hiatus. Sometimes shit just happens, and sometimes shit just happens a lot. And I guess as uncool as it is if someone uses those just to use them, it's really none of my business what makes them back away and take a break. I assume it's typically a good reason, or at least a reasonable reason. That's something I'd let you decide, since you're closer to the scope of just what makes a person hiatus and whether that's an issue you want to tackle. I'm good with whatever, really.

This entire comment should just be "I'm good with whatever" actually...

Though I personally don't mind the multiple-characters-from-one-player flood, 'cause it's multiple characters (unless it's like HURP DURP LOOKIT ALL MY POSTS...LET'S NOT REPLY TO ANY OF THE COMMENTS), but I'M GOOD WITH WHATEVER WHY AM I COMMENTING

[rossum_ceo]

I agree that 6-10 posts in a log seems reasonable and much for the same reasons as you. Of course I still feel that if you make the log, or main comm post you should be covered. I'm just mentioning since it seems to be a concern today.

[killyoudead]

ELLE YOU ARE THE EASIEST TO PLEASE. No thirty-comment minimum on logs, got it.