Leave a comment

(The comment has been removed)

[voice] bluffing_ruffle September 11 2010, 03:38:19 UTC
That is... not quite the word I would use for it.

And why is it that you use the singular form of the word when I have been addressing them as murderers?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

[voice] bluffing_ruffle September 11 2010, 03:50:27 UTC
Turning your question on its head, who ever said that I had any reason to do so?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

[voice] bluffing_ruffle September 11 2010, 03:57:51 UTC
Because they might well be.

[Yeah, he's going to run around and around this circle with you if you let him.]

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

[private/voice] bluffing_ruffle September 11 2010, 04:09:44 UTC
[Snappish]

I don't know how many of them there are--whatever party is responsible for this, he has left no trace of himself--or herself, or themselves! This man is clearly perfectly familiar with standard forensics techniques and knows how to get around them. He has to be capable of playing several steps ahead of others.

Furthermore, I don't give a damn for the fame or the money. If I can flush someone out by angering him for giving his credit to more than one person, it will be slightly more than I have to go on at the moment! The fewer people looking for him, the less of a danger there is of forcing him to do something dangerous and risky.

Now, do you know something, or are you simply wasting my time?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

[private/voice] bluffing_ruffle September 11 2010, 04:17:22 UTC
Oh, I'm quite sure it will...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up