I have a question for the conservatives, even though they are seemingly under-represented in this community. Maybe i'm just willfully blocking out any piercing critiques that i have read on liberal policy, being the hardcore pinko that i am, but it seems to me that there has been very little critique of liberal policy, at least in this forum. For
(
Read more... )
One of the handy things about knowing that Jim down the street owns a shotgun is that its far easier to get a search warrant because Jim has a gun.
What destroys this programs credibility is not who supports or opposes it, its that we've spent $1 billion to be able to know that Jim owns a shotgun. Is this infrmation really worth $1 billion, and $113 million more per year?
Why did it cost that much? The computer system powering this thing cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Five people at my University could have built the backend system as a project if we were given a modest hardware budget and 4 months. A few networking guys could roll out infrastructure to the places that need terminals, and a couple of desktop guys and a bunch of Dell PCs could do the job.
The original estimate of $2 million for this thing was probably a realistic goal, so what happened to the other $998 million? Why is this thing FIVE HUNDRED times over budget? Why didn't they stop such a runaway black hole of money before it cost this much?
And more importantly, why do we care if Jim owns a shotgun? Jim already has a hunting license, do they expect him to go deer hunting with a pencil?
Reply
Reply
Reply
and i have heard some police forces do find the system useful.
Reply
Leave a comment