Comments | cannibalmind: For <strong class="lj-user"><a href="/read/user/lastvoyages">lastvoyages</a></strong>: Second Casefile [Written]

cannibalmind

For lastvoyages: Second Casefile [Written]

Sep 12, 2011 17:50

[Private]Case Study Two: Richard, "Ritchie", Inmate to Will Graham, last name unknown ( Read more... )

doctor is in session, hannibal is a ham, ritchie, getting philosophical, blah blah blah etc., lady murasaki's lessons, will, tell me all your secrets

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

t_x_unit September 13 2011, 02:21:36 UTC

My reading suggestion was of assistance.

cannibalmind September 13 2011, 02:59:36 UTC

It certainly offered me food for thought.

[Private]
Who is this child making a pest of himself in my nice discussion? He doesn't seem to do anything but whine and try to contradict people.

Private: t_x_unit September 13 2011, 03:10:01 UTC

Doctor Crane, Jonathan. Inmate.

He is intellectually confrontational and predisposed to the use of chemical weapons.

Private cannibalmind September 13 2011, 03:16:10 UTC

Oh lovely, I've found my Chilton. His arguments are rather weak. He must fall back on chemical weaponry on a regular basis then.

Private: When a Terminator gets your witticisms, others should worry... t_x_unit September 13 2011, 03:32:08 UTC

I like your turn of phrase.

He strongly desires this, yes. Previous logs indicate a strong desire for empowerment through fear.

Private cannibalmind September 13 2011, 04:42:15 UTC

There is a man with a doctorate on board this vessel who is my intellectual equal, but this is not him.

He seems to be trying to make up for some personal inadequacy or another.

Re: Private t_x_unit September 13 2011, 04:47:51 UTC

He's exhibited signs of mental instability and increased frustration.

This may begin to manifest in obscure and/or sadistic sexual impulses.

Private cannibalmind September 13 2011, 16:33:11 UTC

Hm. For someone whose mental plate-stack is so wobbly, he seems rather desperate to invite someone to push it over.

Re: Private t_x_unit September 13 2011, 19:33:14 UTC

Your species is inherently self-destructive.

Private cannibalmind September 14 2011, 19:22:49 UTC

I have heard this argument before. Tragically that may well be the case. Stabler and less self-destructive human subpopulations are possible, but as a whole we are fractious, chaotic and infested with the Free Range Rude.

Re: Private t_x_unit September 15 2011, 03:03:01 UTC

You require unsensed, strict control.

Private cannibalmind September 15 2011, 03:42:37 UTC

Myself personally, the entire race, or its lawless aspects?

Re: Private t_x_unit September 15 2011, 03:48:08 UTC

Your species.

It rebels upon realisation of captivity, unless believing it personally beneficial.

Private cannibalmind September 15 2011, 03:54:03 UTC

And their caretakers should be...

Re: Private t_x_unit September 15 2011, 03:56:33 UTC

Something efficient.

Private cannibalmind September 15 2011, 17:19:48 UTC

...I believe I understand.

[He is rather calm about the idea.]

I suppose it is a better option than self-extermination.

Back to all threads