in sociology last year (aaaaaages ago, back when i was a mere sophmore), we talked about sexism and disparities in treatment with regard to gender...most of the stuff was rather nitpicking-ish, but there were some crazy statistics regarding pay differences based purely on gender. which is weird. it seems to be one of those Things That Are Left From
(
Read more... )
right now, i'm sorta teaching math/computer programming... both of which are heavily male-dominated. But, the university of chicago does like an affirmative-action-type-thing (but they call it "community outreach".... i guess "affirmative action" is a dirty word). so they've made an effort to hire more female and minority teachers... and this year, all of the leadership responsiblities went to women. would this be better? or would you think to yourself, "gee, they're only letting me do Stuff cuz i'm a girl?"
eh, i dunno, i guess it just depends on the political environment. chicago is too liberal.
i take that back. fox chapel is too conservative.
Reply
so there's my affirmative action rant. in general, i think no one should get special treatment, whether preferential or otherwise. which is more open-minded-equal, if you think about it. and it is definitely sucking that i am The Girl.
fox chapel would certainly benefit from some serious liberalization.
Reply
so, to get the point, i guess most girls in your situation would probably get discouraged and quit. which is very unfortunate.
Reply
fuck that.
Reply
erm...male-dominated things suck. but i don't think affirmative action is the way to fix that. it just breeds resentment. women and minorities have to just stick to it -- get qualified, and fight.
all playwrights are male, by the way. all of them. except for tina howe and paula vogel. (ok, so maybe there are a couple others. but REALLY.)
why? don't fucking know. DIE, DIE.
Reply
Leave a comment