(Untitled)

[skepticalities]

Have some more campers! As a reminder, pleaaaaase check your HTML before sending your application in! Beware of loose tags and whatnot. Something that a couple of us have also noticed - using smartquotes (“ instead of ") in your URL HTML will bork the link entirely, but sometimes, programs like Gdocs default to it because . . . it's Gdocs. We've

Comments

[unpresciented]

In on the No.6 apps and I will be promptly downloading that as soon as possible, hello series with big flashing lights about being made for me. I especially like the tone of the Nezumi app.

I voted out on the others.

Duo: I have a weird mish-mash of Gundam Wing episodes under my belt, but between those and what's mentioned in the canon, I can't tell that you have his voice down. The app could also use some revising (shortened ellipses [... instead of .. is correct], public instead of puplic, etc.), though I was willing to overlook that. I think your current sample concept lends to you being more canon reliant than not. While there is a voice here in the sample, I'm just not sure it's the correct one. Off a voice being there, I almost voted you in, so if you could explain the reasoning why you used this type of voice, I could easily change my mind!

Quatre: I wibbled you out. I think your app is also canon-reliant and I'm not getting much of the described character there, though I do see a voice underneath it. I'm just not seeing as much of the voice as described, though it's more of what I'd expect.

Kane: This is one of those one-sided conversations+narrations that can really impact a voice coming through clearly. Straight-up monologues with occasional outside inclusions are better for showing a voice. As it is, I can't actually pull a voice from this and the app itself is kind of choppy.