He tempers his philosophizing with practical matters, such as actually engaging with the enemy. And I since he speaks from a position of authority and not exile, I am more willing to believe the success of his advice.
I admit that part of my curiosity about Machavelli's work is purely personal. In some respects I feel that I can trust his word because of the closeness in time and place but the fact that I cannot as of now corroborate his statements makes it difficult for me to judge the accuracy of his theories. It would be interesting--perhaps more so--to read the advice of a commander instead of a diplomat. How long did Sun Tzu hold power?
He was a general of Wu for half his life, and his advice was said to allow Qin Shihuangdi to unify China. Of course, there are conflicting reports as to his personal life, but the worthiness of such advice is apparent in the results.
Of course. Biographers are interested in collecting only slander or miracles. Accounts of someone's private life need to be taken with a grain of salt.
You should know, the author wrote that while in exile. I doubt his account is without bias.
Reply
I met him once, although before he wrote this. His writing has bias in other respects as well.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Have you tried Sun Tzu yet?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
[rolls her eyes] They get absolutely nothing right.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment