Recently, I’ve been playing on the freeway. No, I’m not referring to
my commute home. I’m referring to the
LA Times Bottleneck Blog (syndicated on LJ as
bottleneckblog). There seem to be a bunch of folks on this blog that only see black and white: if it isn’t a fully built out underground rail system for Los Angeles, it is no good. Busway... no good. HOV lanes... no good. Light rail... no good. Never mind the impact or cost of the construction. Never mind the impracticalities of it. Equally, there are folks who think we should just turn everything into shimmering concrete: damn the houses or other impacts.
Of course me, ever the pragmatist and the historian, can’t stop from jumping in. So I have. What discussions, you might ask?
Wilshire subway, bus fare hike: No!Longer buses on Orange Line405 logjamFreeway revolt in the Inland EmpireCarpool "snitch line": Is it needed?405 opposition moves to ValleyBeverly Hills Freeway: Revisionist historyFreeway conspiracy theory405 widening: Here come the lawyers! Yup. That’s me. Playin’ on the freeway.