From
The New York Times "room for debate section." "Beyond that, I believe that Justice Souter will be remembered as a careful, thoughtful, and open-minded judge. He was conservative in the sense that he respected precedent and did not seek drastic change, but he was liberal in that he saw a role for judges in protecting individual rights against arbitrary or oppressive government action. "
Believing The US Supreme Court has a role in protecting us from overarching governmental abuses is not a "liberal" position?!?!?! Really, really?!?! This is what we are arguing about this decade? God damn it people, is there no progress?