Leave a comment

c_regalis September 16 2006, 00:51:53 UTC
No, no, no! It was Steve McQueen. BLG posted about it and cornekopia pisted the picture. See?



(And, god, yesssss. So hot. Callum, I mean. I mean, both, but mostly Callum. Yes.)

Reply

timian September 16 2006, 01:12:26 UTC
Ohhhhhh. Okay. For a second there.... Well. Also, there are things I could say re Callum and his cock, but I am strong and will not say them. ::classy::

Reply

c_regalis September 16 2006, 01:17:47 UTC
Oh. You know, you... it's totally okay if you are NOT strong here. Just... don't. This is the LJ where everyone says... you know. Stuff. *blush*

But you are still totally CLASSY. *admires*

And there... um... yawns...

I have to go to bed, like, two hours ago. Don't tell anyone, okay?

Reply

mrsronweasley September 16 2006, 01:21:01 UTC
I can say them for you, if you want. I'm not classy in the least.

Reply

j_s_cavalcante September 16 2006, 05:37:57 UTC
Well, gosh, don't leave us, um, hanging. Say them!

Reply

c_regalis September 16 2006, 11:27:46 UTC
Oh, by all means, go ahead!

Reply

brooklinegirl September 16 2006, 13:53:28 UTC
I can help, too. I have MANY things to say about Callum's cock.

Reply

joandarck September 16 2006, 03:02:05 UTC
You mean like how CKR wins in the "well hung" department? Considerably? I'm figuring that's got to be an artifact of the photo angle - if the whole thing's not a fake, that is. Because if a professional macho man gets photographed au naturel, doesn't he make sure no one sees the photo unless it's flattering? Also, doesn't that look a bit dark for his skin tone?

Feel free to treat all of these as rhetorical questions. No. I mean that.

Reply

c_regalis September 16 2006, 11:29:46 UTC
It's indeed somewhat... smallish. Ahem. And darkish.

*has another close look*

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

c_regalis September 16 2006, 11:32:11 UTC
It is? You sure? *sigh* It would have been somewhat weird. I tried looking for the, uh, original picture, just in case it exists. But I couldn't find it. Why are you so sure?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

c_regalis September 17 2006, 16:02:54 UTC
Oh. Okay then. That... uh. Makes sense, I guess.

Damn.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

c_regalis September 17 2006, 18:57:29 UTC
Wow. o.o

*is amazed with you*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up