Hmmn - another of lj's features that I've never actually used - the share button! So let's give it a whirl, because I'm quite excited about this... *g*
Originally posted by
mescott at
Patreon!My Patreon is live!After a bunch more talking and tweaking, I’ve decided to concentrate on Astreiant for now. I’m doing a simple monthly appeal: if enough people
(
Read more... )
(I've got an original science fiction I began when I was eighteen or so, it's plotted - more or less - but not finished. I haven't taken it out to have a look at because I don't want to depress myself! But I will. I've also got an original on the go right now, and I'm being badgered by my family to write down the stories I used to tell them when we were children - but those are still in my head.
I started writing fan fiction as a way to say thank you to all those authors whose stories had lifted my spirits when I was a lot iller than I am now and housebound a lot of the time [actually something the medics took more seriously than I did - I was quite happy being housebound!]. But in so doing I began to see what it actually might take to write properly - and at length - something I admire in helenraven's work is her ability to sustain a plot at length. I love 'Waiting to Fall' [Sorry for bailing on that conversation, but I was working in London with no access to comment on Lj - apparently 'Social Media' is confined to Twitter & Facebook - likely to be in Birmingham next week - with the same problem] but you can't really say it sustains a plot - more like a series with a story arc.)
Anyway, my thoughts are that it takes a lot to write professionally and this kind of 'crowd funding' is fine. You have no obligation to fund, if you don't want to - and the author does seem to be offering something more than the privilege of supporting her writing in return - and there are a number of levels at which you can do it. So you could just offer $1 (€/£ etc.) a month until you were sure how you felt about it.
But is it morally acceptable? I can't see it's any less morally acceptable than the sort of 'subscription' funding authors in earlier centuries went in for. It's just a case of whether you, as an individual, want to support the cause.
As for 'deserving' causes - only you can be the judge of that, one person's 'deserving' is another person's 'waste of money'. With regard to the end product - that's the price of sponsoring the arts. You can make a judgement about how well you already regard the artist - or the art - or you can take a punt. Again, it's a personal judgement.
I think the important thing is to be clear about your motives and what you expect from your investment - once you have that, you should be comfortable with your decision and any end result.
Reply
Leave a comment