Vampires: TVD & Jossverse
I was never that into Spike. Or Angel, for that matter. My favorite 'version' of Spike was S7 Spike and it took about four years of Angel for me to get really attached to Angel. In the Jossverse, my sympathies tended to lie pretty firmly with the humans.
What's different about the vampires in The Vampires Diaries?
One big difference is where we start. In S1 of Buffy, Angel isn't known to be a vampire until episode 7. In The Vampire Diaries, Stefan is one of the point of view characters. We're in the point of view of vampirism, right off the bat. Buffy waded into shades of gray over time, and generally using our PoV human characters as a base, while Stefan and Elena are the co-leads for the majority of S1 of TVD. Then Damon becomes a protagonist instead of an antagonist over the course of late S1 and Caroline gets vamped in early S2, giving us 3 vampire leads in the show.
While I'm mentioning Elena, she's another huge point - she's the lead human viewpoint character and, unlike Buffy, she has no duty to go out and stake vampires. We don't get introduced to the idea that vampire hunters exist in this universe until "Family Ties" and, out of the three humans, one is a horrible mother (sorry, Liz! I love you!), one is an abusive father (I don't love you, Richard) and one is an overall scumball (pfft, Logan). It's not the most shining introduction to vampire hunters in the history of fiction. And the appearance of the vampire hunters serves - at that point - mostly to give Damon a virtue (protecting his brother). Completely different vibe from Buffy and her moral duty to slay.
Another huge difference comes from the way that newbie vampires are treated - much more sympathetically in TVD than in Jossverse. Newbie vampires are kinda disposable in the Jossverse. They rise and they get staked and there are a lot of them. There might be single episodes where Buffy kills off more vampires than have been killed in the entire run of TVD so far.
We also have the very extreme motivational differences - the Master wanted to take over the world and turn humanity into his blood slaves. Angelus wanted to destroy the world (and humanity).
Damon wants to save the woman that he loves from an eternity of starvation and wouldn't mind getting revenge on the town that put her there. Anna wants to save her mother from the same. Katherine wants to save her own skin (incidentally, humanity might end up screwed, but that's not a goal of hers). The scope is generally bigger in BtVS.
The scope is bigger for the good guys in BtVS, too. In the Jossverse, atoning for your sins is about actively going out and trying to make the world a better place. In TVD, it mostly seems to be about repressing your killer instincts and possibly about dating high school students. Different scope. Both sides in TVD are more about 'protecting our own' than anything that's about the rest of the world.
This is something that has the potential to change with the whole moonstone plot but it hasn't so far.
Another element is that nothing is as... metaphorical in TVD as it is in the Jossverse. The vampires in TVD feel much more grounded in reality as opposed to being creatures of literary fantasy. You don't lose your soul when you turn, so you can't get it back from a spell. I like that.
Also, for Stefan and Damon specifically - first, their relationship feds on that affection that I feel for them and makes it grow. I'm not sure I'd like either of them anywhere near as much if the other one weren't around. The Spike-Angel relationship does not give me that same effortless (sometimes unwilling) baseline of affection that the Stefan-Damon relationship does.
I'm not making any statements on the quality of one show verses another, but I do like the vampire mythology better in TVD than in the Jossverse. And I think that's also a big part of why I liked Stefan and Damon so much more quickly.
http://butterfly.dreamwidth.org/1293257.html |
comments | Comment at Dreamwidth
What's different about the vampires in The Vampires Diaries?
One big difference is where we start. In S1 of Buffy, Angel isn't known to be a vampire until episode 7. In The Vampire Diaries, Stefan is one of the point of view characters. We're in the point of view of vampirism, right off the bat. Buffy waded into shades of gray over time, and generally using our PoV human characters as a base, while Stefan and Elena are the co-leads for the majority of S1 of TVD. Then Damon becomes a protagonist instead of an antagonist over the course of late S1 and Caroline gets vamped in early S2, giving us 3 vampire leads in the show.
While I'm mentioning Elena, she's another huge point - she's the lead human viewpoint character and, unlike Buffy, she has no duty to go out and stake vampires. We don't get introduced to the idea that vampire hunters exist in this universe until "Family Ties" and, out of the three humans, one is a horrible mother (sorry, Liz! I love you!), one is an abusive father (I don't love you, Richard) and one is an overall scumball (pfft, Logan). It's not the most shining introduction to vampire hunters in the history of fiction. And the appearance of the vampire hunters serves - at that point - mostly to give Damon a virtue (protecting his brother). Completely different vibe from Buffy and her moral duty to slay.
Another huge difference comes from the way that newbie vampires are treated - much more sympathetically in TVD than in Jossverse. Newbie vampires are kinda disposable in the Jossverse. They rise and they get staked and there are a lot of them. There might be single episodes where Buffy kills off more vampires than have been killed in the entire run of TVD so far.
We also have the very extreme motivational differences - the Master wanted to take over the world and turn humanity into his blood slaves. Angelus wanted to destroy the world (and humanity).
Damon wants to save the woman that he loves from an eternity of starvation and wouldn't mind getting revenge on the town that put her there. Anna wants to save her mother from the same. Katherine wants to save her own skin (incidentally, humanity might end up screwed, but that's not a goal of hers). The scope is generally bigger in BtVS.
The scope is bigger for the good guys in BtVS, too. In the Jossverse, atoning for your sins is about actively going out and trying to make the world a better place. In TVD, it mostly seems to be about repressing your killer instincts and possibly about dating high school students. Different scope. Both sides in TVD are more about 'protecting our own' than anything that's about the rest of the world.
This is something that has the potential to change with the whole moonstone plot but it hasn't so far.
Another element is that nothing is as... metaphorical in TVD as it is in the Jossverse. The vampires in TVD feel much more grounded in reality as opposed to being creatures of literary fantasy. You don't lose your soul when you turn, so you can't get it back from a spell. I like that.
Also, for Stefan and Damon specifically - first, their relationship feds on that affection that I feel for them and makes it grow. I'm not sure I'd like either of them anywhere near as much if the other one weren't around. The Spike-Angel relationship does not give me that same effortless (sometimes unwilling) baseline of affection that the Stefan-Damon relationship does.
I'm not making any statements on the quality of one show verses another, but I do like the vampire mythology better in TVD than in the Jossverse. And I think that's also a big part of why I liked Stefan and Damon so much more quickly.
http://butterfly.dreamwidth.org/1293257.html |
comments | Comment at Dreamwidth