claiming the throne shite

Jul 28, 2006 02:25

Just read an article on the BBC about some bloke who tried to say he was a claimant to the throne in the 1930s ( Read more... )

historical, smite!

Leave a comment

Comments 12

delle July 28 2006, 01:40:05 UTC
claiment to the throne in the 1930s???

Pardon an Anglophile American from chiming in, but I thought the Crown was pretty well settled from at least Victoria on - her grandon Edward (right?) to his son George to his first son Edward and then to 2nd son Bertie when Edward David decided Wallis was more attractive (god, that man SO had to be gay) to the present Queen, yes? Where is there room in this lineage for another claiment?

(And if he's claiming male descent in lieu of the present Queen, it's my understand that England never had the no-females-allowed rule that France did)

But, again, American, not British, altho I'm fascinated by y'all.

And most excellent points on Aragorn. I never thought about how the elves were the power behind the King there...

Reply

jamjar July 28 2006, 07:03:47 UTC
The Wallis/Edward forced abdication thing had more to do with their political leanings -facist, supporters of Hitler- than that she was American or divorced. Not that they were keen on that, either, but Wallis was an excellent way of getting rid of a potentially troublesome king.

Not much fun for Bertie, though, since he didn't want to be king, but felt he had to do it.

Reply

burntcopper July 28 2006, 09:04:51 UTC
article on the bbc news website, shropshire section - he's quite clearly a nutter, but *really*.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/5222426.stm

Re: Aragorn. I was thinking about teh Faramir/Steward/Aragorn factor, and then realised that the only ones who have any 'proof' on Aragorn's bloodline are the elves. Otherwise it's just the word of one scruffy ranger who if you look at it during the early days of LOTR had no interest in being king whatsoever.

Reply

mrslant July 30 2006, 00:53:53 UTC
Act of Settlement 1701, full text here.

The Act remains in force and there is no room for any unknown claimant (unless he's got a serious army).

Reply


derryderrydown July 28 2006, 06:24:16 UTC
This is why I loved Henry Tudor's claim to the throne. Which was, "I've got a bit of royal blood, and I've married this chick who's got a bit of royal blood but, basically, I JUST KICKED YOUR ASSES."

*happy sigh*

Reply

jamjar July 28 2006, 07:07:56 UTC
I love that the question of inheritence generally boils down to "Yeah? You and what army?" And if they don't have a damn good answer to that, they're out.

Well, than and, "Wouldn't everybody else be worse?"

Reply

burntcopper July 28 2006, 09:16:46 UTC
Henry Tudor OWNZ U ALL.

'I've managed to garner enough support because you nutters have been killing off everybody for the past few years, I have a clear head and am not obviously a nutter, so get out of the way, throne will be mine!'

'PS: I promise to get the country completely out of debt.'

Reply

derryderrydown July 28 2006, 09:22:38 UTC
Henry Tudor is totally my favourite dead monarch.

Reply


grondfic July 28 2006, 07:24:39 UTC
Everything you said goes DOUBLE for anyone claiming descent from Jesus and Mary Magdalene.

Reply


birdsflying July 28 2006, 09:05:15 UTC
Word. Though, the guy from australia was actually something that Tony Robinson researched and didn't really believe it much - his daughters certainly didn't. I was watching it on the discovery channel yesterday because it was that or: 'Diana: Death of a Princess' and I'd rather spork my eyes out than watch that.

Mostly when it comes to the royal family I say..zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Reply


denorios July 28 2006, 09:29:29 UTC
You know, our queen is actually related to both William the Conqueror and Harold, through one of Harold's daughters who went off and married a Kiev prince. The bloodline went round and about before coming back into the English line, don't ask me when. So she's sort of doubly-entitled to the throne!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up