Yesterday Harper went to Governor-General Jean and requested that she grant him a proroguement of Parliament. It wasn't just a wild rumour. He seriously, bare-faced, went to the head of state and said, hey, seeing as I'm about to lose the confidence of Parliament here, can I have a two months breather and shut down ParliamentEven more stunning
(
Read more... )
There are those who say that given that since 1926 the Governor-General has, de facto, been solely a figurehead and rubber-stamper of the PM's decisions, that it has basically become precedent that she should remain so (which I don't buy) or at least that it appears that way/she should have very strong reasons for departing from that (which I am more open to -- I just think that those strong reasons were apparent on the current facts).
Because she was appointed by a Liberal Prime Minister and is a former journalist, the Conservatives have long viewed her with suspicion. There were even attempts to claim she was a supporter of Quebec independance when she was first installed. So it has been said that for her to turn down a Conservative Prime Minister's request would have appeared party political, ie, that she was biased towards the Liberals/left.
I have no doubt that that is the way the Conservatives would have spun it. But I don't think such decisions should be based on What People Will Think.
Reply
Leave a comment