Since Hillary Clinton is a full-fledged presidential candidate now, I've been thinking about American attitudes towards women holding America's highest office. Until really recently, it's been pretty much dead certain that a lot of the US was against having a female president. Now I am hearing a lot that a woman might not be so bad...as long as it'
(
Read more... )
Reply
That's a good point. There probably isn't the resistance to the idea of a female national leader in the UK like there is in the US because it HAS been done before. And with Thatcher being in power for 11 years like she was, it seems pretty logical to think that she kept her position largely on her own merits.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Once Labour started to sort themselves out, the daggers came out for Thatcher, followed by each other in the Tory party, leading to the nonentitiy Major becoming leader (and PM) just because he hadn't hacked anyone off yet.
Reply
:)
Reply
Reply
Reply
This is where I disagree. She kept her position for that length of time because Labour under Foot and Kinnock couldn't win an election, the SDP-Liberal Alliance was hobbled by the nature of the first-past-the-post system (as well as the Steel-Owen infighting that marked the later part of the 1980s), and her own party didn't dare to oust her until it looked like she was an electoral liability. Michael Heseltine nearly had a chance in 1986 after the Westland helicopter incident...but then again, a choice between him and Thatcher would've been something of a Hobson's choice.
Reply
Leave a comment