(no subject)
I have really come to a delimma. I think that I am the most neautral person on this whole war thing. And it totally depends on the day and who I'm talking to. When Me and my family are sitting at home talking about the war I feel like I am as liberalistic about my thinking as you can get. But on the other hand, I can't help but to point out the conservative side of the war in Ms. Hannah's class. Here's my conclusion...instead of dropping bombs, why don't we just assasinate the bastard? I know it would be tricky, but it could be accomplished. And everyone is worrying that if we do that then one of his sons will take over. Hell, they're awful people too. Why don't we just either ask them to leave the country, or be killed? I know this really does probably sound like an extremely right wing proposal, but why the hell not? Think about it, we would be saving thousands of innocent lives, and at the same time, guaranteeing that Saddam isn't a threat to us or his own people anymore. Then we could simply let their government progress into a democracy, by monitering their elections to ensure that no dictator's ever assume power again. I think the instinctive reaction to the assasination proposal is..."no! that's not our place!" But to me, it's not about place. It's about morals. Even if we don't kill Saddam and his son's, they will sure make up for it by continuing to murder people who object to their government, and raping women. Hmmmm......either we assisinate Saddam and his sons.....drop bombs on thousands of innocent people.......or allow his reign to continue, allowing him to continue killing people himself........which proposal preserves more lives, people?
(Just a little food for thought)
(Just a little food for thought)