""

Mar 31, 2008 22:32

So-called "neutral" bots... They're almost as bad as Decepticons, if you want my opinion. I'm tempted to say worse than, but let's be honest here, at least a Neutral would be willing to work for you. If you're willing to pay the price. We did have some useful Neutral contacts during the War; I'm not saying they're not to be trusted at all. But a fair amount of them worked primarily for the Cons as well.

It's a difficult time, everything hanging in the balance. I hate to sound so melodramatic, but considering the fact that we have Cons around--Cons who were supposed to have been wiped out by the end of the War--is it any wonder it's so vital that we have as much support on our side as possible? And stuck on this rock--no offense to these Humans, of course--we're even as to what we can offer. That being: not much.

I don't like the idea of them being just as friendly with the enemy as with us, especially if we wouldn't know if they were paid off or got a better deal. All of that info-gathering, that's just gaining a leg up, having something to offer as a show of loyalty. The loyalty only lasts as long as the payments do. It'd be a dangerous move to put any real trust in them.

I'd call them traitors, but then again, they supposedly don't have a side. Perhaps the others may think I'm being brash, but I find that it would be tactically disadvantageous of us to enlist their help when we seem to be holding our own just fine.

...There. Now that I've gotten that out of my system...I appear to have a bitty bot taking a stasis nap on me. This WakeJumper seems particularly fond of--heh, just about everyone. Surprised he could find a comfy spot on me. A stasis nap doesn't sound like such a bad idea, actually...

neutrals, wakejumper

Previous post Next post
Up