I. Reducing Health Insurance Costs & Improving Quality
In the health care debate, there's one provision I feel should be relatively non-controversial, because it's a free-market idea, and conservatives and Republicans are supposed to be in favor of the free market.
Here's a piece Ezra Klein wrote for The Washington Post back in June:
WashPostHere
(
Read more... )
In fact, I have a hard time understanding why we would require everyone who is presently uninsured to purchase health insurance through a National Exchange, why we wouldn't just set up a Single Payer system... If thems was da rules--namely, that you had no choice BUT to have a certain amount of health insurance--I can't come up with a decent reason why we shouldn't all be on the same plan that rises to that level of coverage. Boutique care could be purchased on the side. This isn't to say I'm against exchanges in theory, I can see where they would be better than nothing and could actually have an impact. I suppose my line of thinking is that since we're talking about it, why settle? That's the job of the Democratic Party apparently.
Up until a month ago I was fairly sure that whatever came out of D.C. on this was going to be just slightly better for people than it was for the Industry. As of a few weeks ago, however, I reckon the whole effort is doomed. Industry will benefit greatly; I just hope some under- or uninsured people benefit some at this point. I'm quite disappointed in the whole sorry affair. I knew I'd never get remotely close to what I wanted to see happen, but I had a whole lot of faith that something really good would happen none the less.
Reply
Leave a comment