Leave a comment

Comments 5

(The comment has been removed)

bookelfe December 18 2013, 15:41:12 UTC
I'm actually excited for Anna Kendrick -- I think she'll do a different Cinderella than the classic one, but the only way this is going to work is if everyone puts their own stamp on the character that's a little bit different.

I grew up on the Lesley Ann Warren version too, but I'm really glad the Brandy version exists! And I just think it would be amazingly meta for Cinderella from the R&H to grow up into the Cinderella from Into the Woods.

Reply


amelia_petkova December 14 2013, 16:12:06 UTC
WAIT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN THERE'S NO NARRATOR NOOOO

A lot of the costumes do look nice. Can Johnny Depp sing decently? I know he was in Sweeney Todd, but I never got around to watching it.

Reply

bookelfe December 18 2013, 15:43:13 UTC
Unless they are going to surprise us! WHICH I HOPE THEY ARE, but ugh.

Johnny Depp can . . . sort of sing? Kind of? Um.

Reply


fadeintodawn December 15 2013, 05:23:34 UTC
I made an embarrassingly girly noise when I first saw a photo of the princes in costume - I didn't even know I wanted that but it's perfect.

My big concern is that a film version with very literal fairy-tale costumes and expensive sets won't have the same ability as a stage musical to play with audience expectations and story and comment on narrative manipulation (especially if there isn't a narrator!!). I've seen a few stage versions and they often use shabby costumes, and one even had the narrator as a literal puppet master. Films get the luxury of sets and close ups, but that often makes them just too literal for imaginative musicals. I'm worried it will just look silly.

Also WHY Johnny Depp WHY. Keep him away from Sondheim again, please!

Reply

bookelfe December 18 2013, 15:43:49 UTC
Yeah, I'm really concerned that a lot of the meta aspect is going to be lost. Like, it's an okay story with it, but it's not Into the Woods!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up