Stand back, I'm going to try prognostication...
If you work in the business of generating web pages to display to users, you need to know: there's going to be some major changes in the browser landscape over the next year or three
( Read more... )
Most of the pixel-perfect graphic design weenies I encounter still haven't wrapped their minds around the concept that the screen might be something other than The One True Size (which is probably something resembling 1000x680-ish) Which means they're still stuffed, due to device variety.
I have this pristine mental caricature (derived from years of professional mental scarring) of Photoshop-wielding graphic designers, who spend days mocking up a "web page" (translation: a pretty picture with the usability characteristics of a not-very-usable thing[1]) and expect perfect replication, fancy transparency effects and all, in every browser out there. CSS3 and PNGs notwithstanding, the main problem is their conceptual failure to distinguish the relative desirability of "pretty" and "usable".
[1] I was going to say "1960s-era jetfighter cockpit", but at least one of those is pretty clear on which bits are the controls, if not necessarily what they all do. Said caricature usually wants all the controls helpfully disguised as graphic fripperies.
I know this is a caricature, and many web graphics weenies are much more realistic these days, but I still get nasty surprises occasionally.
I might agree about computer-type-people not using mobiles as a primary compute device. I'm nowhere near as sure that people who currently pretty much don't use computers (except maybe as web browsers) aren't going to start using mobiles (and I include tablets in that) as their primary means to access the intarwebs, if only in read-only mode.
Reply
Leave a comment