#TwitterNews: How the #TwitterAbuser's #slandering marks him as a #loser
I wanted to get this done earlier, but whenever I got it done it had to be before tomorrow.
Seems it would lack any merit if it were posted on April Fool's Day.
The method of identifying Mike Broemmel's accounts is finding those tweeting the same thing he does
at the exact same time he does it from his main account. That's him middle bottom, though, realistically, they're all him.
Once you've identified any number of his accounts, it naturally follows that any other accounts making identical tweets at
the same time those do are also his, which ultimately is his failing.
Two points of interest to his slander towards me. He calls me a loser & a child predator. Or a child molestor, or a child rapist.
Now, by me, I mean he calls @NewsOfBlueBirds those things, never referring to me by name.
He never uses my name because he doesn't know it, which means he can't accuse me of being a convicted criminal for any of that.
Much as with all his claims being false, he can't know I'm any form of criminal without my name to look me up online.
Mike Broemmel, or I should say Michael F. Broemmel, is a convicted criminal.
The reason he goes by "Mike" is to prevent people from searching him by his full name, which is connected to his criminal history.
He's an actual criminal, I've never broken the law. But I don't go by my name because the women he targets he slanders by their names
and photos of them. He invades their social media accounts to take personal pics of them and their families to use against them.
That's one good reason not to let him know my real name. Mike Broemmel is the kind of cyberstalker to use a scorched earth policy. He also
targets their families. At least he has for Williams.
I don't stalk Mike Broemmel, I track his abuse: link.
However, since he has kept accusing me of stalking him, at this point there can't be any harm in taking a look at his account.
Mike Broemmel follows nearly 200 accounts that offer to get more followers if you pay them. I don't mean they're following him, he follows them.
He may not use their services, but given he only makes the same tweets over and over, thousands of times, one has to wonder.
Along with his slander that I'm a child predator, Mike Broemmel follows, to use his favorite numerical assignment, dozens of accounts posting porn
of girls who look to be underage. He was also sent to federal prison, in part, for stealing money from child clients he had. Stealing their inheritances.
That's sort of a child predator.
In going after me, Mike Broemmel created 3 new accounts [ link] themed to a book he wrote on protecting teens online. He targets women online, big
surprise he never wrote anything about that. Why women? I suspect it's due to being abandoned by his birth mother. He's an orphan, a fact he
disclosed in an article written about the Menninger's Clinic, the same asylum that diagnosed him for being clinically depressed, which is the gateway
mental disorder for for many other degenerations.
Mike Broemmel faves/likes his abuse on all of his numerous accounts, but what about his own? There's a few interesting things in there, considering
he's been promoting himself as a defender of children. That's fallen flat on its face before: link.
A problem in promoting himself up as a defender of children is they may come to his account and click on his favorites.
Okay, I may've looked at his account prior to today.
That's not the only one like that in there, and to be clear there's nothing wrong with it. His liking that kind of thing is perfectly fine,
but the idea of children, even teens, coming to his account and finding he's saving links to videos of men jerking off?
That's not good.
My partner and I enjoy this sort of thing too but we have the good sense not to leave it where children can find it. What's around the apartment gets locked
in a trunk before we get visits from any of the younger relatives, or any family really.
Also keep it away from my Twitter account, as it's for posting twitter related news. It has nothing to do with that.
I suppose Mike Broemmel didn't take that into consideration. For that alone he's a loser, but that's not the most significant way.
One man using hundreds of accounts to attack others online? There's no kind of bigger loser than that.
Seems it would lack any merit if it were posted on April Fool's Day.
The method of identifying Mike Broemmel's accounts is finding those tweeting the same thing he does
at the exact same time he does it from his main account. That's him middle bottom, though, realistically, they're all him.
Once you've identified any number of his accounts, it naturally follows that any other accounts making identical tweets at
the same time those do are also his, which ultimately is his failing.
Two points of interest to his slander towards me. He calls me a loser & a child predator. Or a child molestor, or a child rapist.
Now, by me, I mean he calls @NewsOfBlueBirds those things, never referring to me by name.
He never uses my name because he doesn't know it, which means he can't accuse me of being a convicted criminal for any of that.
Much as with all his claims being false, he can't know I'm any form of criminal without my name to look me up online.
Mike Broemmel, or I should say Michael F. Broemmel, is a convicted criminal.
The reason he goes by "Mike" is to prevent people from searching him by his full name, which is connected to his criminal history.
He's an actual criminal, I've never broken the law. But I don't go by my name because the women he targets he slanders by their names
and photos of them. He invades their social media accounts to take personal pics of them and their families to use against them.
That's one good reason not to let him know my real name. Mike Broemmel is the kind of cyberstalker to use a scorched earth policy. He also
targets their families. At least he has for Williams.
I don't stalk Mike Broemmel, I track his abuse: link.
However, since he has kept accusing me of stalking him, at this point there can't be any harm in taking a look at his account.
Mike Broemmel follows nearly 200 accounts that offer to get more followers if you pay them. I don't mean they're following him, he follows them.
He may not use their services, but given he only makes the same tweets over and over, thousands of times, one has to wonder.
Along with his slander that I'm a child predator, Mike Broemmel follows, to use his favorite numerical assignment, dozens of accounts posting porn
of girls who look to be underage. He was also sent to federal prison, in part, for stealing money from child clients he had. Stealing their inheritances.
That's sort of a child predator.
In going after me, Mike Broemmel created 3 new accounts [ link] themed to a book he wrote on protecting teens online. He targets women online, big
surprise he never wrote anything about that. Why women? I suspect it's due to being abandoned by his birth mother. He's an orphan, a fact he
disclosed in an article written about the Menninger's Clinic, the same asylum that diagnosed him for being clinically depressed, which is the gateway
mental disorder for for many other degenerations.
Mike Broemmel faves/likes his abuse on all of his numerous accounts, but what about his own? There's a few interesting things in there, considering
he's been promoting himself as a defender of children. That's fallen flat on its face before: link.
A problem in promoting himself up as a defender of children is they may come to his account and click on his favorites.
Okay, I may've looked at his account prior to today.
That's not the only one like that in there, and to be clear there's nothing wrong with it. His liking that kind of thing is perfectly fine,
but the idea of children, even teens, coming to his account and finding he's saving links to videos of men jerking off?
That's not good.
My partner and I enjoy this sort of thing too but we have the good sense not to leave it where children can find it. What's around the apartment gets locked
in a trunk before we get visits from any of the younger relatives, or any family really.
Also keep it away from my Twitter account, as it's for posting twitter related news. It has nothing to do with that.
I suppose Mike Broemmel didn't take that into consideration. For that alone he's a loser, but that's not the most significant way.
One man using hundreds of accounts to attack others online? There's no kind of bigger loser than that.