Suppose 2 brothers wanted to get married. Obviously they are unable to reporoduce. Or say a brother and sister want to get married, but the sister cannot become pregnant. Or the brother is sterile. The deformity argument goes out the window in those 2 situations.
Also, have you ever heard of something called zoophilia? This is a belief system that humans and animals can truly have loving, intimate, sexual relationships. Not to be confused with beastiality, they do not believe in sexually abusing or raping the animal; but that over time the animal and the human being can grow to love eachother so much that they can both willingly engage in sexual intercourse.
So the push to legalize marriage between animals and humans may not be as far off as we may think. Personally, I think this is absurd. You are of course, entitled to your own opinion. I hope I did not sound offensive when commenting on this. I just wanted to make a point. Please reply whenever you get a chance. I look forward to seeing your response.
normally i try to stay out of debates like this because i generally dont have the energy to stay with them.. but i guess i could give you my input on your point of view, since you were so polite about it.
personally.. i dont know what to think about your statement bringing up same sex family relations and sterility.. all i can say is that in MY OPINION, incest is something i could never imagine.. but thats me, and im sure many people out there would disagree.. but i think thats their own decision to go into whatever relationship with whoever they please, especially considering i would like the same to go with me, or any other same sex oriented relationship. but getting married to someone you already have blood relations or legal ties to.. is kind of pointless. i could be wrong, but i would like to know more about that in any event.
as for zoophilia.. never heard of it. and, as you said, it is a belief system, not ever really proven correct. considering animals wouldnt be able to tell us if they were in love with their owner, or "human partner", or if anything they did was consentual.
Also, have you ever heard of something called zoophilia? This is a belief system that humans and animals can truly have loving, intimate, sexual relationships. Not to be confused with beastiality, they do not believe in sexually abusing or raping the animal; but that over time the animal and the human being can grow to love eachother so much that they can both willingly engage in sexual intercourse.
So the push to legalize marriage between animals and humans may not be as far off as we may think. Personally, I think this is absurd. You are of course, entitled to your own opinion. I hope I did not sound offensive when commenting on this. I just wanted to make a point. Please reply whenever you get a chance. I look forward to seeing your response.
Respectfully,
~ Santino R.
Reply
personally.. i dont know what to think about your statement bringing up same sex family relations and sterility.. all i can say is that in MY OPINION, incest is something i could never imagine.. but thats me, and im sure many people out there would disagree.. but i think thats their own decision to go into whatever relationship with whoever they please, especially considering i would like the same to go with me, or any other same sex oriented relationship. but getting married to someone you already have blood relations or legal ties to.. is kind of pointless. i could be wrong, but i would like to know more about that in any event.
as for zoophilia.. never heard of it. and, as you said, it is a belief system, not ever really proven correct. considering animals wouldnt be able to tell us if they were in love with their owner, or "human partner", or if anything they did was consentual.
just my thoughts.
Reply
and thank you for respecting my beliefs
Reply
Leave a comment