Your Information Fortunately Makes It Unnecessary to Read the Original ArticlearchlordsFebruary 21 2009, 03:27:48 UTC
Unfortunately, I'm thinking like a religious fundamentalist. Fortunately, I've learned from experience that you generally don't learn anything by reading these in full, only more points for my argument. (Yes, around here, I'm actually able to say these sorts of things. Not many religious fundamentalists frequent the rare realistic conservative blog.)
1) Another good point. I find it reasonable to include creationism in mandatory courses if it's in a class on religious practices predominant in our culture.
2) Interestingly enough, I've run into completely different points about the female orgasm (the fact that vaginal sex doesn't work very well for it) and about bonobos (the fact that they practice tribadism) in my research. The former would make a nice addition to my misandristic rhetoric for Project AnthraXX, if I could figure out how to use it without being too graphic.
3) Well, it is true based on the assumption that the book is perfectly accurate and literally true in every way. . . .
4) Have you found any valid arguments for the morality of harming other sentients and not humans that aren't based on religion? I haven't.
13) I'm also amused that he's named Bush-and not in the sexual sense, in this case.
Unfortunately, I'm thinking like a religious fundamentalist. Fortunately, I've learned from experience that you generally don't learn anything by reading these in full, only more points for my argument. (Yes, around here, I'm actually able to say these sorts of things. Not many religious fundamentalists frequent the rare realistic conservative blog.)
1) Another good point. I find it reasonable to include creationism in mandatory courses if it's in a class on religious practices predominant in our culture.
2) Interestingly enough, I've run into completely different points about the female orgasm (the fact that vaginal sex doesn't work very well for it) and about bonobos (the fact that they practice tribadism) in my research. The former would make a nice addition to my misandristic rhetoric for Project AnthraXX, if I could figure out how to use it without being too graphic.
3) Well, it is true based on the assumption that the book is perfectly accurate and literally true in every way. . . .
4) Have you found any valid arguments for the morality of harming other sentients and not humans that aren't based on religion? I haven't.
13) I'm also amused that he's named Bush-and not in the sexual sense, in this case.
Reply
Leave a comment