Just some videos for your enjoyment
http://youtube.com/watch?v=yArPNtiQDcMhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=ID_CXC2Zkuw&mode=related&search=http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZwlZ1O2Roh0&mode=related&search=and then there's... uh... this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGzgbcuzbI4&mode=related&search= And what is this guy talking about? either way, it's a cool looking video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N09BIEzDlI&mode=related&search=I'm thinking this last one can be "explained" or maybe responded to is better by what Kristine and I were talking about. It's one of those inductive and deductive/ top dpwn, bottom up things. Evolution, for this case is the top down part, and this bacterial [penguin] flagellum is bottom up, and it just might possibly be one of those things where the two haven't met up yet, but then again, what do I know because I'm no scientist. It could also be the "platypus complex" that I was talkinga bout with her today, where humans NEED to name and categorize everything, but not everything fits nicely into a category. And also, in evolutionary theory, wheren't bacteria like the first organisms to exist? and did they have flagella or not? and if so, then they wouldn't have needed to evolve a flagellum, and if not, then isn't bacteria gaining flagella proof to support evolution? I am majorly confused.