Since this topic has appeared several times on my flist today, I thought I'd make a little post on the topic instead of simply commenting, so as not to belittle anyone's concerns (although, I suppose this is mostly in response to
Lori's post).
See the article I reference
here. (
Gas prices, for the millionth time. This time, with math! )
Therefore, while the actual PRICE comparisons are shocking, the reality is that MORE of our net wages are going to gas than are the net wages of those in Europe, because the reality of life in the United States is what it is. Our fault, of course, for continuing to be dependent on cars, and resisting the introduction of mass transit in our cities and in our rural areas, but reality nonetheless.
Reply
I suppose the biggest difference is simply in how long we've been dealing with this problem, vs. Europe (and the rest of the world). They've had this problem long enough that while we were getting all hyped up on SUVs and large vehicles, they skipped that whole thing, simply b/c it made no sense. A Passat in England is absolutely massive, and the UK isn't even in the heart of the small car world.
I found a thesis investigating the differences between US and UK car travel, which definitely agrees with much of what you said. Interesting read- http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:GChQiqj2aJoJ:www.geog.ox.ac.uk/staff/jdargay_wp02.pdf+compare+commutes+countries&hl=en. I'd argue (without having done much research) that the differences are a result of such issues as gas prices, average income (which the study mentioned was much lower than the US; apparently my friend was reasonably accurate), etc., as opposed to being the inverse- the high gas prices were the cause, rather than the response to high usage of public transportation. I think I'm just babbling at this point, and spitting back what the study says, so I'll just recommend that as some good reading if you're interested.
Reply
The other issue is how QUICKLY. MORE than doubled since the beginning of summer. That's unheard of. I don't think it's gone up that quickly in the UK (but I could be wrong, also having done very little research, and instead just relying on hearsay from those living there). The prices HAVE gone up, but not as drastically as they have here.
Reply
Reply
Give us 3 years, then I COULD do the smart thing, and trade down in cars. But for the moment, I'm stuck. And what's effing Bush doing about it?
Nothing.
Of course.
Reply
There's an article at Slate that was pretty entertaining- http://slate.msn.com/id/2125224/. Can't really go wrong with Bush bashing and baseball, can you?
It's too late, in a manner of speaking, for most people. The people who CAN do something (trade in their SUVs for Hybrids, etc.) usually don't, because they don't feel the crunch; the people who need to get more fuel-efficient cars usually can't. I admit my mother falls into the first category (even though her lease is up in May, and she could get a lovely little sportscar that she's been wanting for years; but, no, she'll be leasing yet another large SUV). My father, who falls under the second category, is fortunate because he can ride his bicycle to work most mornings, and when he needs to drive 5 hours to pick up my sister from the airport, he can take my car (36 MPG combined, whoo!). Isn't that always the way, though- the people who can, won't, and the people who would, can't. (yet another interesting site- http://www.fueleconomy.gov/)
Reply
Leave a comment