Sequels that shouldn't be

Mar 28, 2009 18:33

I want to see the new Crank movie for the sole purpose of finding out how to survive a free fall from a couple hundred feet on to a car.

Leave a comment

lessthanbry March 29 2009, 19:53:07 UTC
If you didn't like Crank, there's something wrong with you.

Reply

black_cracka March 29 2009, 21:38:11 UTC
I loved crank, I just want to know how dumb Hollywood thinks the average viewer is.

There is absolutely no explanation possible that will satisfy me as to how he could have survived that fall. Even if they claim that he was almighty god it will not be sufficient.

Reply

lessthanbry March 29 2009, 22:48:48 UTC
Why do they need an explanation?

Reply

black_cracka March 29 2009, 23:08:13 UTC
So that things make sense, there needs to be some sort of continuity beyond character names if this is a sequel.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

black_cracka March 30 2009, 00:36:04 UTC
Making that timeline work would melt my brain.

Reply

lessthanbry March 30 2009, 04:33:48 UTC
What, you mean beginning at the exact moment the first one ended isn't enough continuity for you? He's indestructible, deal with it!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up