The chip is designed as a transmitter not a receiver (so far, or so they say) however the chip can be accessed from anywhere. Im other words, if the chip is functioning and they place receivers in parking meters or lamp posts or street signs or anywhere else then you can be tracked by it anywhere you go with it on you. As a traveller in a foreign country how often would you go anywhere without your passport? Your entire trip could be electronically databased, the times you were where you were and where you went! That chip can be accessed without your knowledge anywhere anytime...
the REALLY scary thing is the new Real ID will also have these chips in them and will be able to access your credit report, your credit score, pull FBI, and CIA, NORAD, INTERPOL etc.. records on you forever and ever... The REAL ID, it is hoped, will be a federally legislated ID that you will HAVE to have in order to work or rent or purchase things in the US... They are scheduled to be out by May 2008. Welcome to the Mark of the Beast, the End of your Freedom
( ... )
Yeah there's been quite a lot of talk about Real ID and people need to wake the fuck up.
I know it's pretty unpopular, too. I'm going to keep hoping that if there's a line we won't cross this is it.
Problem is, the weakness of this country are the Foot-In-The-Doors (see, Partial Birth Abortion Act 2003) and I'm afraid the quiet presence of the new passports is that very foot in the door the American public is unaware of that will herald in the Real ID.
True. It is interesting to me - though not surprising - that they didn't tell me about the data chip when I applied. I found the info in a pamphlet that came with the passport.
I just got "chipped" involuntarily and if I disable it, I am a mark. So now I am trackable against my will, and suspect if I reject it.
Well, the good news is that states are rejecting it left and right, including Washington.
And rightfully so. I only fear that they are rejecting it for financial reasons, not for privacy violations reasons. I find it interesting that they are trying to utilize the state level DMVs as opposed to the federal level IRS to do this, also. I can only imagine they would be doing that to put the cost of implementation on the states.... But the resources are there within the IRS so... Hmmm... I need to think on that for a bit.
Currently most of what record there is of you is just in-state. Some states don't tie in their DMV yet but that is more tied in then anything else (Example: you have a DUI in Oregon, you can't go to Washington and apply for a brand new driver's license, however up until about 8 years ago, you could and in some states you still can) The thing is State and National is still seperate in this country - in order to create an empire however, you cannot have seperation in your territories with the freedom to make changes on their own. A Nation State (which soon will include Canada and Mexico under the Amero), rather then a group of seperate states forming a union is much easier for a fascist dictatorship to control. To fuse the State and National information agencies would further blur the lines between States in a Union and a single entity under the rule of one Nation, or in this
( ... )
But since when did the government not use info from private companies to further their "cause"?
I understand their need to infiltrate the states by doing this. You make a very good point. And it is a very well explained point.
It is a very fine line that we are all walking right now between unification and succession. Hopefully, there will be enough change in the upcoming federal elections to tip the scales back to a more normal state of affairs. Whatever that is...
I don't have the time right now to watch that link, but I will. I don't think it is accurate to say that the IRS has "no government ties at all" because the Department of the Treasury is their client. So they do have "ties" to the government and are hired to carry out the responsibilities of the secretary of the Treasury.
treasury pays rent to the Federal Reserve Bank - yet another privately owned company. Government pays rent to corporations built by Rockefeller and Co. FDR fucked us, then the first thing they did was finance a war on another continent and begin the NWO. The timeline goes further back but all substantial evidence only goes back as far as the beginning of the last century. With news, media and the movement of information suddenly exploding in the past 108 years our information has become more complete and reliable.
the REALLY scary thing is the new Real ID will also have these chips in them and will be able to access your credit report, your credit score, pull FBI, and CIA, NORAD, INTERPOL etc.. records on you forever and ever... The REAL ID, it is hoped, will be a federally legislated ID that you will HAVE to have in order to work or rent or purchase things in the US... They are scheduled to be out by May 2008. Welcome to the Mark of the Beast, the End of your Freedom ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
I know it's pretty unpopular, too. I'm going to keep hoping that if there's a line we won't cross this is it.
Problem is, the weakness of this country are the Foot-In-The-Doors (see, Partial Birth Abortion Act 2003) and I'm afraid the quiet presence of the new passports is that very foot in the door the American public is unaware of that will herald in the Real ID.
Reply
I just got "chipped" involuntarily and if I disable it, I am a mark. So now I am trackable against my will, and suspect if I reject it.
Reply
And rightfully so. I only fear that they are rejecting it for financial reasons, not for privacy violations reasons. I find it interesting that they are trying to utilize the state level DMVs as opposed to the federal level IRS to do this, also. I can only imagine they would be doing that to put the cost of implementation on the states.... But the resources are there within the IRS so... Hmmm... I need to think on that for a bit.
Reply
Cui Bono?. They can't use them.
Currently most of what record there is of you is just in-state. Some states don't tie in their DMV yet but that is more tied in then anything else (Example: you have a DUI in Oregon, you can't go to Washington and apply for a brand new driver's license, however up until about 8 years ago, you could and in some states you still can) The thing is State and National is still seperate in this country - in order to create an empire however, you cannot have seperation in your territories with the freedom to make changes on their own. A Nation State (which soon will include Canada and Mexico under the Amero), rather then a group of seperate states forming a union is much easier for a fascist dictatorship to control. To fuse the State and National information agencies would further blur the lines between States in a Union and a single entity under the rule of one Nation, or in this ( ... )
Reply
But since when did the government not use info from private companies to further their "cause"?
I understand their need to infiltrate the states by doing this. You make a very good point. And it is a very well explained point.
It is a very fine line that we are all walking right now between unification and succession. Hopefully, there will be enough change in the upcoming federal elections to tip the scales back to a more normal state of affairs. Whatever that is...
I don't have the time right now to watch that link, but I will. I don't think it is accurate to say that the IRS has "no government ties at all" because the Department of the Treasury is their client. So they do have "ties" to the government and are hired to carry out the responsibilities of the secretary of the Treasury.
si?
Reply
Reply
but you can't tell me that they wouldn't use their info just because they are private for profit.
Reply
Leave a comment