so everyone is elated as scott petersen is found guilty. it's a story to which i've paid as little attention as possible, and it seems to enveloped us so that here i'm am writing about it. i'm disturbed. not so much as i was, say, on the morning of the 3rd while i dreamt that kerry lost the election and the smirking chimp is still directing our
(
Read more... )
as far as more coverage being given to the attractive white female being murdered, well, that's just the press. its like.. what will the people buy on the rack? theyll buy whatever looks appealing to the eye/ear. so, the point of "coverage on a murder story" has nothing to do with justice. has nothing to do with morals. nothing to do with solving the crime. it has only to do with the people that are going to buy the story. and we all know this. but, its just like buying a magazine and i was having this discussion with my friend the other day. we buy a fashion mag for all the gorgeous glamorous godesses(sort of).. we wouldn't be interested if their were normal people in it so much. there is a demand for stuff, doesn't ever mean it is morally good to demand it. its actually quite fucked up. but, maybe the conclusion to it all is that maybe we should start focusing on more important stuff.. like justice. rather than satisfying our desires with selfish tendencies. because, well, isn't that what its stemming from? our selfishness for the desire of something interesting rather than something justified? i cant say exactly, but it seems like everyone has their priorities messed up and thats just about a normalcy.
i feel as though i should do something about it. its like watching someone commit a crime, right? but, all you're doing is watching it happen. and analyzing. but, what to do? read different magazines.. read different news networks.. only give attention to where its due and point out to others what they are actually doing when they're cheering for something as a guilty verdict. not everyone cares. sadly.
but, anyway, what do i know? i selfishly read all those articles and mags. maybe i should make a statement. maybe u dont understand the comparison that i am trying to make between the mag and the article.
so, what (not you, the majority of) people demand, newswise, is not always justified. but, it sells and people want it. the majority dont analyze. they hardly think, they just act.
Reply
as for the press selling what sells, yes, of course.
but do you honestly think the average murder trial gets nearly the judicial resources that this case got? it's not just the media.
Reply
no, it isn't just the media. we all have something to do with it.
Reply
but when it comes to anyone else, it's just a cop out, if that. some things indeed can't be helped. and some people will always have advantages. but so many inequalities are directly caused by the action or disaction of other people. and in these cases, fairness is under our control.
Reply
Leave a comment