I've yet to see this logic done right.
"You shouldn't be cautious around [this minority] people because in reality,[this minority] people get victimized far more often than they victimize others."
Do the people who write that think like that? Or do they just use it as signalling, without regard to meaning at all?
Do the people who write that think like that? Or do they just use it as signalling, without regard to meaning at all?