Content Strike: Friday March 21

Mar 16, 2008 15:21

The one-day content strike is on for this Friday, March 21, from midnight GMT to midnight GMT.

For 24 hours, we will not post or comment to LJ. Not in our own journals, not in communities. Not publicly, privately, or under friends-lock.

This is a protest that will have long-lasting effects, showing up forever in the daily posting statistics ( Read more... )

content strike

Leave a comment

Comments 198

sono_cat March 16 2008, 20:38:17 UTC
*thumbs up* I'm going to post this in my LJ along with your original post.

Reply

cammiel March 19 2008, 13:36:28 UTC
doing the same!

Reply


starcharmer March 16 2008, 20:50:28 UTC
Definately doing this and I'll post about it in my LJ, too.

Reply


shaharazad March 16 2008, 20:58:20 UTC
Posted.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

beckyzoole March 16 2008, 21:09:36 UTC
Point taken, and it's a legitimate one. I was vaguely aware that "Easter is early this year", but hadn't realized it was quite this early.

I do apologize for putting you in a difficult position.

(This Friday happens to be a Jewish holiday too, Purim, which overlaps with Good Friday once every 200 years or so. It's not a holiday in which Jews abstain from using electrical devices, though.)

Reply

hobbitblue March 16 2008, 23:36:09 UTC
To reassure you, I'm not sure I would automatically assume people who weren't posting on that day for whatever reason were doing it as part of the proposed strike, unless they'd said previously "Don't look for me on Friday, I'm supporting this (with suitable linky)".

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


kightp March 16 2008, 23:28:26 UTC
I haven't been reading the LJ communities lately, and I have no idea what this is about. Can you point me to a link that explains the purpose?

Reply

wvusublime March 17 2008, 02:46:20 UTC
My guess would be here. SUP no longer allows new users to create Basic Accounts- you now have to sign up for an ad-supported Plus Account, or a Paid Account.

Reply

kightp March 17 2008, 02:59:55 UTC
Ah.

If LJ's decision is based on a desire to get more revenue for its services, I don't see how a strike - which could, if it were widespread, cut the company's costs for that day significantly - is an especially effective protest action.

Reply

azurelunatic March 17 2008, 03:22:00 UTC
The fewer ads viewed and clicked through, the less advertising revenue, so it wouldn't just be costs that are going down.

And the reason they have so many people here looking at the ads is the content. We control the content. This is a demonstration of that control.

I believe this is more a protest of how the situation was handled (poorly!) than necessarily a protest of the business decision. If it's a business decision you have to make, make it, and announce it as such, and beforehand. Do not conceal it and spin it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up