Interesting, exhausting weekend. Took in Old Days by Harold Pinter, written in 1971. One of those plays with only three actors, minimalist furniture, all white, and lots and lots of meaningful pauses to which you the audience are to attach Meaning. At the end of the play - in which the only real action is Kate and her husband Deeley receiving a
(
Read more... )
Sounds very improving. Do you feel improved?
Reply
I feel more entertained than improved, I guess, and I only complain about the lack of clear resolution because I get used to good ol' Shakespeare, where you know that at the end you will see either a wedding or two or a stage littered with bodies, but either way, that sucker is wrapped up and all the mystery is explained. Mistaken identities are revealed, plot points untangled (mostly), but this is not that kind of play. Pinter is likewise lacking in swordplay, I note.
Another theory - Kate and Anna are two sides of the same woman. This makes lots of sense, given how it was staged.
Reply
I believe I've managed to escape seeing Pinter? I don't recall family members in any of his plays. Not to say they haven't been in any of them, but if they were, it must've been outside the context of mandatory viewing.
Ah, Steven Culp, not to be confused with Robert, who is a funny guy.
Reply
Reply
My first encounter with Robert Culp was watching The Greatest American Hero. God, I loved that show when I was a kid. What a fantastic idea: a guy with superpowers who doesn't know how to use them.
Reply
In re: swashbuckling. Tell me a little swordplay doesn't dress up a play. Bet your Dad was a regular Errol Flynn with a rapier. :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment