Good evening, everyone! Happy Valentines day, for those of you who celebrate it!
First, a brief link recommendation. If you've never heard of
Postsecrets, you should definitely check them out: essentially, people send in anonymous postcards with their secrets on them. Some are sad, some are quirky, some are touching, and all are absolutely awesome
(
Read more... )
I think that I'd organize it along themes - history of ideas, technology, politics... I'd definitely want to talk about more than the Great Men of History and the Wars They Fought. I'd trace women's history too... and I'd be sure to barely talk about Europe in the whole first semester. Really, not much went on there except for some conquering and fighting amongst themselves until like the 1400s... China, India, Egypt, the Middle East and other places were MUCH more interesting for the longest time.
I think that I'd probably split it at about 1500, although that in itself is a very Euro-centric way of looking at things... Crazy things were beginning to happen in the Americas, Europeans were getting a bit more expansion-happy... More things were being written down. (Yay printing press! But even so China had already been there, done that...)
The second half of the course would talk a LOT about colonialism. Europeans seemed to get their sticky fingers in everywhere. I'd still talk about places like China and Japan outside of the context of the minor missionary influence. The Ottomans were badass too. Only in the last few weeks would I talk about the 20th century. One of the things I dislike about some history courses is that they place so much emphasis on stuff that happened, well, A) in medieval Europe (especially when so much cooler stuff was happening elsewhere! Well, the plague was pretty cool in a horrifying kind of way and they did build some very pretty churches and illuminate some lovely manuscripts BUT I DIGRESS) but also B)the impression that everything that happened in the 20th century was somehow RADICALLY DIFFERENT IN EVERY WAY than what had happened before and so we must spend SO MUCH TIME on talking about these things, and I really disagree. I mean, yeah, there's a lot to talk about, but in the larger scheme of things... There's a "modern" veneer to it, but I don't see the 20th century as being particularly unique. Lots more ways of recording things and large numbers of people doing stuff (oh, population growth...) and lots of horrific wars and people doing horrific things to each other... But weren't the religious wars in Europe in the 1600s also devastating and examples of total war/genocide/etc.? They may not have had helicopters and brought-to-you-live-in-your-own-home news teams, but...
Also, talk about other genocides besides the holocaust. Yes, it should definitely be addressed. Nie weider. But I definitely feel that other tragedies, such as the horrific events of Rwanda, need to be addressed more in school too. Learn from the past so that we might prevent such tragedies. (Not that the past should be studied solely for the benefit of the present, but...)
(Um, did I answer the question? Maybe. I'm not sure! Feel free to ask me to elaborate/ramble more. ;) )
Reply
(I think you answered the question just fine. It is something I have mulled over for a while, since I am annoyed at how much my world history courses seem to be centered on two continents.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment