Two coworkers of mine -- who I will leave nameless to protect the innocent -- cannot settle a raging debate, and they have turned to me for an impartial third-party opinion. In turn, I turn to you, people of the Internets. Can you take a few seconds and help me put this to rest for them?
Poll A bitter sweets debateExplain yourself in comments, if you'd like -- especially
(
Read more... )
Comments 41
Broken chocolates that have been "tested?" Not so much.
Reply
Reply
This is assuming that the chocolates are from a trustworthy source to begin with, of course. If the source is dubious, then the intact ones and the broken ones might both have some kind of nasties hiding in them (cue Monty Python references, track 12, marker 3 or possibly marker 4). This is also assuming that the environment does not include coworkers with access to the chocolates whom I do not trust with write access to anything that will be ingested. If either of those conditions don't hold, I take no chocolates regardless.
Reply
Reply
Scenario 3 made me all kinds of paranoid and gave me visions of chocolates served up by Sicilians with immunity to iocane powder. In scenario 6, I would take a pristine, random chocolate since the only filling I really hate is cherry cordial and those are pretty easy to spot - usually.
Reply
Leave a comment